Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, 826 Zhangheng Road, Shanghai 201203, China.
J Mol Graph Model. 2010 Nov;29(3):326-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2010.09.004. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
The lack of accurate and efficient methods for target identification has been the bottleneck in drug discovery. In recent years, inverse docking has been applied as an efficient method in target identification, and several specific inverse docking strategies have been employed in academic and industrial researches. However, the effectiveness of these docking strategies in multiple targets identification is unclear. In this study, five inverse docking schemes were evaluated to find out the most effective approach in multiple targets identification. A target database containing a highly qualified dataset that is composed of 1714 entries from 1594 known drug targets covering 18 biochemical functions was collected as a testing pool for inverse docking. The inverse docking engines including GOLD, FlexX, Tarfisdock and two in-house target search schemes TarSearch-X and TarSearch-M were evaluated by eight multiple target systems in the dataset. The results show that TarSearch-X is the most effective method in multiple targets identification and validation among these five schemes, and the effectiveness of GOLD in multiple targets identification is also acceptable. Moreover, these two inverse docking strategies will also be helpful in predicting the undesirable effects of drugs, such as toxicity.
缺乏准确和高效的靶标识别方法一直是药物发现的瓶颈。近年来,反向对接已被应用于靶标识别的有效方法,并且在学术和工业研究中已经采用了几种特定的反向对接策略。然而,这些对接策略在多个靶标识别中的有效性尚不清楚。在这项研究中,评估了五种反向对接方案,以找出在多个靶标识别中最有效的方法。收集了一个包含高度合格数据集的靶标数据库,该数据集由来自 1594 个已知药物靶标的 1714 个条目组成,涵盖了 18 种生化功能,作为反向对接的测试池。反向对接引擎包括 GOLD、FlexX、Tarfisdock 以及两个内部靶标搜索方案 TarSearch-X 和 TarSearch-M,通过数据集的八个多靶系统进行了评估。结果表明,在这五种方案中,TarSearch-X 是多靶识别和验证中最有效的方法,而 GOLD 在多靶识别中的有效性也是可以接受的。此外,这两种反向对接策略也有助于预测药物的不良作用,如毒性。