Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Ergonomics. 2010 Nov;53(11):1311-24. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2010.519054.
The article proposes a multi-level approach for evaluating communication skills training (CST) as an important element of crew resource management (CRM) training. Within this methodological framework, the present work examined the effectiveness of CST in matching or mismatching team compositions with regard to hierarchical status and competence. There is little experimental research that evaluated the effectiveness of CRM training at multiple levels (i.e. reaction, learning, behaviour) and in teams composed of members of different status and competence. An experiment with a two (CST: with vs. without) by two (competence/hierarchical status: congruent vs. incongruent) design was carried out. A total of 64 participants were trained for 2.5 h on a simulated process control environment, with the experimental group being given 45 min of training on receptiveness and influencing skills. Prior to the 1-h experimental session, participants were assigned to two-person teams. The results showed overall support for the use of such a multi-level approach of training evaluation. Stronger positive effects of CST were found for subjective measures than for objective performance measures. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: This work provides some guidance for the use of a multi-level evaluation of CRM training. It also emphasises the need to collect objective performance data for training evaluation in addition to subjective measures with a view to gain a more accurate picture of the benefits of such training approaches.
本文提出了一种多层次的方法来评估沟通技巧培训(CST)作为机组资源管理(CRM)培训的重要组成部分。在这个方法论框架内,本工作研究了 CST 在团队构成的层级地位和能力方面匹配或不匹配的效果。很少有实验研究评估了 CRM 培训在多个层面(即反应、学习、行为)和由不同地位和能力的成员组成的团队中的有效性。进行了一项有两个(CST:有 vs. 没有)乘两个(能力/层级地位:一致 vs. 不一致)设计的实验。共有 64 名参与者在模拟过程控制环境中接受了 2.5 小时的培训,实验组接受了 45 分钟的关于接受能力和影响能力的培训。在 1 小时的实验会话之前,参与者被分配到两人一组。结果总体上支持使用这种多层次的培训评估方法。CST 的主观测量比客观绩效测量有更强的积极效果。相关性声明:这项工作为 CRM 培训的多层次评估提供了一些指导。它还强调了除了主观测量外,还需要收集客观绩效数据进行培训评估,以便更准确地了解此类培训方法的好处。