Center for Pain Research and Behavioral Health, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0154, USA.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Nov;40(11):694-704. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3396.
Quasi-experimental clinical trial.
This study compared outcomes from graded exercise and graded exposure activity prescriptions for patients participating in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for chronic low back pain. Our primary purpose was to investigate whether pain and disability outcomes differed based on treatment received (graded exercise or graded exposure). Our secondary purpose was to investigate if changes in selected psychological factors were associated with pain and disability outcomes.
Behavioral interventions have been advocated for decreasing pain and disability from low back pain, yet relatively few comparative studies have been reported in the literature.
Consecutive sample with chronic low back pain recruited over a 16-month period from an outpatient chronic pain clinic. Patients received physical therapy supplemented with either graded exercise (n=15) or graded exposure (n=18) principles. Graded exercise included general therapeutic activities and was progressed with a quota-based system. Graded exposure included specific activities that were feared due to back pain and was progressed with a hierarchical exposure paradigm. Psychological measures were pain-related fear (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Fear of Pain Questionnaire), pain catastrophizing (Coping Strategies Questionnaire), and depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory). Primary outcome measures were pain intensity (visual analog scale) and self-report of disability (modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire).
Statistically significant improvements (P<.01) were observed for pain intensity and disability at discharge. The rate of improvement did not differ based on behavioral intervention received (P>.05 for these comparisons). Overall, 50% of patients met criterion for minimally important change for pain intensity, while 30% met this criterion for disability. Change in depressive symptoms was associated with change in pain intensity, while change in pain catastrophizing was associated with change in disability.
Physical therapy supplemented with graded exercise or graded exposure resulted in equivalent clinical outcomes for pain intensity and disability. The overall treatment effects were modest in this setting. Instead of being associated with a specific behavioral intervention, reductions in pain and disability were associated with reductions in depressive symptoms and pain catastrophizing, respectively.
Therapy, level 2b–.
准实验临床试验。
本研究比较了接受多学科慢性下背痛康复计划的患者接受分级运动和分级暴露活动处方的结果。我们的主要目的是调查治疗方法(分级运动或分级暴露)是否会导致疼痛和残疾结果的差异。我们的次要目的是调查选择的心理因素的变化是否与疼痛和残疾结果相关。
行为干预已被提倡用于减少慢性腰痛的疼痛和残疾,但文献中相对较少报道比较研究。
在 16 个月的时间里,从一家门诊慢性疼痛诊所连续招募了患有慢性下背痛的患者。患者接受物理治疗,并辅以分级运动(n=15)或分级暴露(n=18)原则。分级运动包括一般治疗活动,并采用基于配额的系统进行推进。分级暴露包括由于背部疼痛而害怕的特定活动,并采用层次暴露范式进行推进。心理测量包括疼痛相关恐惧(恐惧回避信念问卷、坦帕运动恐惧量表、疼痛恐惧问卷)、疼痛灾难化(应对策略问卷)和抑郁症状(贝克抑郁量表)。主要结局测量指标是疼痛强度(视觉模拟评分)和自我报告的残疾(改良 Oswestry 残疾问卷)。
出院时疼痛强度和残疾均有显著改善(P<.01)。基于接受的行为干预,改善率没有差异(这些比较的 P>.05)。总体而言,50%的患者疼痛强度达到最小临床重要差异标准,30%的患者达到残疾标准。抑郁症状的变化与疼痛强度的变化相关,而疼痛灾难化的变化与残疾的变化相关。
物理治疗辅以分级运动或分级暴露可导致疼痛强度和残疾的临床结果相当。在这种情况下,整体治疗效果是温和的。疼痛和残疾的减轻与抑郁症状和疼痛灾难化的减轻分别相关,而不是与特定的行为干预相关。
治疗,2b 级。