Donini L M, Cuzzolaro M, Spera G, Badiali M, Basso N, Bollea M R, Bosello O, Brunani A, Busetto L, Cairella G, Cannella C, Capodaglio P, Carbonelli M G, Castellaneta E, Castra R, Clini E, Contaldo F, Dalla Ragione L, Dalle Grave R, D'Andrea F, Del Balzo V, De Cristofaro P, Di Flaviano E, Fassino S, Ferro A M, Forestieri P, Franzoni E, Gentile M G, Giustini A, Jacoangeli F, Lubrano C, Lucchin L, Manara F, Marangi G, Marcelli M, Marchesini G, Marri G, Marrocco W, Melchionda N, Mezzani B, Migliaccio P, Muratori F, Nizzoli U, Ostuzzi R, Panzolato G, Pasanisi F, Persichetti P, Petroni M L, Pontieri V, Prosperi E, Renna C, Rovera G, Santini F, Saraceni V, Savina C, Scuderi N, Silecchia G, Strollo F, Todisco P, Tubili C, Ugolini G, Zamboni M
Sapienza University of Rome, Medical Physiopathology Department, Food Science and Nutrition Laboratory,P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Eat Weight Disord. 2010 Mar-Jun;15(1-2 Suppl):1-31.
This paper is an Italian Expert Consensus Document on multidimensional treatment of obesity and eating disorders. The Document is based on a wide survey of expert opinion. It presents, in particular, considerations regarding how clinicians go about choosing the most appropriate site of treatment for a given patient suffering from obesity and/or eating disorders: outpatient, partial hospitalization, residential rehabilitation centre, inpatient hospitalization. In a majority of instances obesity and eating disorders are long-term diseases and require a multiprofessional team-approach. In determining an initial level of care or a change to a different level of care, it is essential to consider together the overall physical condition, medical complications, disabilities, psychiatric comorbidity, psychology, behaviour, family, social resources, environment, and available services. We first created a review manuscript, a skeleton algorithm and two rating scales, based on the published guidelines and the existing research literature. As the second point we highlighted a number of clinical questions that had to be addressed in the specific context of our National Health Service and available specialized care units. Then we submitted eleven progressive revisions of the Document to the experts up to the final synthesis that was approved by the group. Of course, from point to point, some of the individual experts would differ with the consensus view. The document can be viewed as an expert consultation and the clinical judgement must always be tailored to the particular needs of each clinical situation. We will continue to revise the Document periodically based on new research information and on reassessment of expert opinion to keep it up-to-date. The Document was not financially sponsored.
本文是一份关于肥胖症和饮食失调多维治疗的意大利专家共识文件。该文件基于对专家意见的广泛调查。它特别提出了关于临床医生如何为患有肥胖症和/或饮食失调的特定患者选择最合适治疗场所的考虑因素:门诊、部分住院治疗、住院康复中心、住院治疗。在大多数情况下,肥胖症和饮食失调是长期疾病,需要多专业团队协作的方法。在确定初始护理级别或改为不同护理级别时,必须综合考虑整体身体状况、医疗并发症、残疾情况、精神共病、心理、行为、家庭、社会资源、环境和可用服务。我们首先根据已发表的指南和现有研究文献创建了一份综述手稿、一个框架算法和两个评级量表。其次,我们强调了一些在我国国家卫生服务和现有专科护理单位的特定背景下必须解决的临床问题。然后,我们将该文件的十一次渐进修订版提交给专家,直至最终综合版获得该小组批准。当然,在各个要点上,一些专家个人的观点可能与共识观点不同。该文件可被视为一次专家咨询,临床判断必须始终根据每个临床情况的特殊需求进行调整。我们将根据新的研究信息和对专家意见的重新评估定期修订该文件,以使其与时俱进。该文件没有获得资金赞助。