Landon Bruce E, Reschovsky James D, Pham Hoangmai H, Kitsantas Panagiota, Wojtuskiak Janusz, Hadley Jack
Department Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2009 Dec 1;9(4):213-233. doi: 10.1007/s10742-010-0057-z.
In order to create an empirically derived parsimonious typology of physician financial incentives that will be useful for future research, we used data from the nationally representative 2004-2005 Community Tracking Study Physician Survey (N = 6,628). Linear regression analyses informed by economic theory were used to identify the combinations of incentives associated with an overall financial incentive to expand services to individual patients. The approach was validated using two nonparametric methods (CART analysis and data mining techniques) and by examining the relationship between the resulting typology and other measures of physician behavior including hours worked, visit volume, and specialty-adjusted income. Of the 6,628 physicians surveyed, approximately 25% (1,605) reported an overall incentive to increase services and 75% (5,023) reported either neutral incentives or incentives to decrease services. Men, who were approximately 75% of respondents, were slightly more likely to report incentives to increase services (P < 0.05). There were no differences in reported incentives according to specialty. We created two typologies (one with eleven categories and the other with a collapsed set of six categories) based on combinations of variables measuring ownership, base compensation methods, and financial incentives. The percentage with an overall incentive to increase services ranges from 6% for employed physicians compensated via fixed salary to 36.7% for owners in low capitation environments with either individual or practice level productivity incentives. The criterion validity of the typology was established by examining the relationship with adjusted physician income, hours worked, and visit volume, which showed generally consistent relationships in the expected direction. A parsimonious typology consisting of six mutually exclusive groups reasonably captures the continuum of incentives to increase service delivery experienced by physicians.
为了构建一种基于实证得出的、简洁的医生财务激励类型学,以便为未来研究提供帮助,我们使用了具有全国代表性的2004 - 2005年社区追踪研究医生调查数据(N = 6,628)。运用经济理论进行的线性回归分析,用于确定与向个体患者扩大服务的总体财务激励相关的激励组合。该方法通过两种非参数方法(分类与回归树分析和数据挖掘技术)进行验证,并通过考察所得类型学与医生行为的其他指标(包括工作时长、就诊量和专业调整收入)之间的关系来验证。在接受调查的6,628名医生中,约25%(1,605名)报告有增加服务的总体激励,75%(5,023名)报告有中性激励或减少服务的激励。占受访者约75%的男性,报告有增加服务激励的可能性略高(P < 0.05)。根据专业不同,报告的激励没有差异。我们基于衡量所有权、基本工资补偿方法和财务激励的变量组合,创建了两种类型学(一种有11个类别,另一种有合并后的6个类别)。有增加服务总体激励的比例,从通过固定工资获得补偿的受雇医生的6%,到在低人头费环境中具有个人或诊所层面生产率激励的所有者的36.7%不等。通过考察与调整后的医生收入、工作时长和就诊量之间的关系,确立了该类型学的效标效度,结果显示在预期方向上总体关系一致。由六个相互排斥的组组成的简洁类型学,合理地涵盖了医生在增加服务提供方面所经历的激励连续统。