Pham Hoangmai H, Landon Bruce E, Reschovsky James D, Wu Beny, Schrag Deborah
Center for Studying Health System Change, 600 Maryland Ave SW, Ste 550, Washington, DC 20024, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 2009 May 25;169(10):972-81. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.78.
Most quality metrics focus on underuse of services, leaving unclear what factors are associated with potential overuse.
We analyzed Medicare claims from 2000-2002 and 2004-2006 for 35 039 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with acute low back pain (LBP) who were treated by 1 of 4567 primary care physicians responding to the 2000-2001 or 2004-2005 Community Tracking Study Physician Surveys. We modified a measure of inappropriate imaging developed by the National Committee on Quality Assurance. We characterized the rapidity (<28 days, 29-180 days, none within 180 days) and modality of imaging (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging [CT/MRI], only radiograph, or no imaging). We used ordered logit models to assess relationships between imaging and patient demographics and physician/practice characteristics including exposure to financial incentives based on patient satisfaction, clinical quality, cost profiling, or productivity.
Of 35 039 beneficiaries with LBP, 28.8% underwent imaging within 28 days and an additional 4.6% between 28 and 180 days. Among patients who received imaging, 88.2% received radiography, while 11.8% received CT/MRI as their initial study. White patients received higher levels of imaging than black patients or those of other races. Medicaid patients received less rapid or advanced imaging than other patients. Patients had higher levels of imaging if their primary care physician worked in large practices. Compared with no incentives, clinical quality-based incentives were associated with less advanced imaging (10.5% vs 1.4% for within 28 days; P < .001), whereas incentive combinations including satisfaction measures were associated with more rapid and advanced imaging. Results persisted in multivariate analyses and when the outcome was redefined as the number of imaging studies performed.
Rapidity and modality of imaging for LBP is associated with patient and physician characteristics but the directionality of associations with desirable care processes is opposite of associations for measures targeting underuse. Metrics that encompass overuse may suggest new areas of focus for quality improvement.
大多数质量指标关注服务利用不足的情况,而对于与潜在过度使用相关的因素尚不明确。
我们分析了2000 - 2002年以及2004 - 2006年医疗保险索赔数据,涉及35039名患有急性腰痛(LBP)的按服务收费的医疗保险受益人,这些受益人由4567名初级保健医生中的一位进行治疗,这些医生参与了2000 - 2001年或2004 - 2005年社区追踪研究医生调查。我们修改了由国家质量保证委员会制定的一项不适当影像检查的衡量标准。我们对影像检查的快速程度(<28天、29 - 180天、180天内无检查)和方式(计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像[CT/MRI]、仅进行X光检查或未进行影像检查)进行了描述。我们使用有序logit模型来评估影像检查与患者人口统计学特征以及医生/执业特征之间的关系,包括基于患者满意度、临床质量、成本分析或生产力的财务激励措施。
在35039名患有LBP的受益人中,28.8%在28天内接受了影像检查,另外4.6%在28至180天之间接受了检查。在接受影像检查的患者中,88.2%接受了X光检查,而11.8%接受了CT/MRI作为初始检查。白人患者接受影像检查的比例高于黑人患者或其他种族患者。医疗补助患者接受影像检查的速度较慢或检查手段较不先进。如果患者的初级保健医生在大型医疗机构工作,患者接受影像检查的比例较高。与无激励措施相比,基于临床质量的激励措施与较少的先进影像检查相关(28天内检查的比例为10.5%对1.4%;P <.001),而包括满意度指标的激励措施组合与更快速和先进的影像检查相关。在多变量分析中以及当将结果重新定义为进行的影像检查研究数量时,结果仍然成立。
LBP影像检查的快速程度和方式与患者及医生特征相关,但与理想医疗过程的关联方向与针对利用不足的指标的关联方向相反。涵盖过度使用的指标可能为质量改进指明新的重点领域。