Suppr超能文献

单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:成本比较。

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a cost comparison.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Pitt County Memorial Hospital, 600 Moye Boulevard, Greenville, NC 27834, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2011 May;25(5):1553-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1433-z. Epub 2010 Oct 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) should not cost more or less than traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

METHODS

Retrospective cost data were collected from the accounting records of a single institution. A direct comparison of LC and SILC was conducted. Data on the SILC cases converted to LC were included. The total operating room (OR) cost (actual cost to the hospital for equipment, time, and personnel) and the total OR charges (total derived from the OR cost plus a margin to cover overhead costs beyond material costs) were examined. The total hospital charges (OR charges plus hospital charges accrued in the perioperative period) also were included. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data, with p values less than 0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Over a period of 19 months, 116 cases of minimally invasive cholecystectomy were evaluated. Of the 116 patients, 48 underwent LC during the first half of that period, and 68 patients underwent SILC during the second half of that period. Nine of the single-incision procedures were converted to traditional LC, for a 13% conversion rate. The groups were well matched from a demographics standpoint, with no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), diagnoses, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class, or payment. Comparison of all attempted SILCs, including those converted, with all LCs showed no significant difference in cost category totals. A significant difference among all cost variables was found when SILCs were compared with SILCs that required conversion to LC. A significant difference among the cost variables also was found when LCs were compared with converted SILCs.

CONCLUSION

The cost for SILC did not differ significantly from that for LC when standard materials were used and the duration of the procedure was considered. Converted cases were significantly more expensive than completed SILC and LC cases.

摘要

背景

单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)的成本不应高于或低于传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)。

方法

从一家医疗机构的会计记录中收集回顾性成本数据。对 LC 和 SILC 进行直接比较。包括转换为 LC 的 SILC 病例的数据。检查了总手术室(OR)成本(医院设备、时间和人员的实际成本)和总 OR 收费(OR 成本加上超过材料成本的间接成本的总和)。还包括总医院收费(OR 收费加上围手术期发生的医院收费)。使用描述性统计分析数据,p 值小于 0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

在 19 个月的时间里,评估了 116 例微创胆囊切除术患者。在这 116 名患者中,有 48 名在该期间的前半段接受了 LC,有 68 名在该期间的后半段接受了 SILC。有 9 例单切口手术转换为传统 LC,转换率为 13%。从人口统计学角度来看,两组患者匹配良好,年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、诊断、美国麻醉师协会(ASA)分级或支付方式均无显著差异。对所有尝试的 SILC 进行比较,包括已转换的病例,与所有 LC 相比,成本类别总数无显著差异。当 SILC 与需要转换为 LC 的 SILC 进行比较时,所有成本变量之间存在显著差异。当 LC 与转换后的 SILC 进行比较时,成本变量之间也存在显著差异。

结论

当使用标准材料且考虑手术持续时间时,SILC 的成本与 LC 无显著差异。转换病例的费用明显高于完成的 SILC 和 LC 病例。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验