Suppr超能文献

实时 PCR 技术在全血样本中快速检测和鉴定细菌和真菌病原体的作用。

The role of a real-time PCR technology for rapid detection and identification of bacterial and fungal pathogens in whole-blood samples.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.

出版信息

J Infect Chemother. 2011 Jun;17(3):327-33. doi: 10.1007/s10156-010-0168-z. Epub 2010 Oct 26.

Abstract

The rapid diagnosis of pathogens and prompt initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy are critical factors to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with sepsis. In this study, we evaluated a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR-M) test that detects bacteria and fungi in whole-blood specimens, comparing its features to those of a blood culture (BC). Following evaluation of the performance for sensitivity and specificity of PCR-M, 78 blood samples from 54 patients with suspected bacterial infections were evaluated. Whole-blood samples for PCR-M were collected at the same time as BC, and PCR-M results were compared with BC results. As a result, minimum sensitivity of the kit was 1-100 cfu/ml. The PCR-M test correctly identified specificity for 13 out of 14 strains blinded to the assay analyst. Of 78 blood samples examined, 56 (72%) were negative by both methods, and 22 (28%) were positive by at least one of the two methods. PCR-M detected organisms in 21 cases (27%) compared with 12 cases (15%) in BC. The correlation of positives between PCR-M and BC was 92% (11/12), and both methods identified the same organisms in these 11 cases. With higher positive rate compared with BC, PCR-M could detect and identify potentially significant microorganisms within a few hours by using a small volume of a single whole-blood sample. Early detection of microorganisms has the potential to facilitate early determination of appropriate treatment and antimicrobial selection.

摘要

快速诊断病原体并及时开始适当的抗生素治疗是降低与脓毒症相关的发病率和死亡率的关键因素。在这项研究中,我们评估了一种用于检测全血标本中细菌和真菌的多重聚合酶链反应(PCR-M)检测,比较其与血培养(BC)的特征。在评估了 PCR-M 的敏感性和特异性后,我们对 54 例疑似细菌感染患者的 78 份血样进行了评估。与 BC 同时采集用于 PCR-M 的全血样本,并将 PCR-M 结果与 BC 结果进行比较。结果,试剂盒的最低灵敏度为 1-100 cfu/ml。PCR-M 试验正确鉴定了 14 株盲法试验分析人员的特异性,其中 13 株为阳性。在检查的 78 份血样中,两种方法均为阴性的有 56 份(72%),至少有一种方法为阳性的有 22 份(28%)。PCR-M 检测到 21 例(27%)与 BC 检测到 12 例(15%)的生物体。PCR-M 与 BC 的阳性相关性为 92%(11/12),这 11 例均通过两种方法鉴定为相同的生物体。与 BC 相比,PCR-M 能够在数小时内通过使用少量单个全血样本检测和识别潜在的重要微生物,从而提高阳性率。早期检测微生物有可能促进早期确定适当的治疗和抗菌药物选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验