Suppr超能文献

降压治疗除了降低血压还有其他益处吗?

Are there benefits of antihypertensive therapy beyond blood pressure lowering?

机构信息

Erie County Medical Center, State University of New York at Buffalo, 462 Grider Street, Buffalo, NY 14215, USA.

出版信息

Curr Hypertens Rep. 2010 Dec;12(6):440-7. doi: 10.1007/s11906-010-0160-0.

Abstract

Meta-analyses strongly suggest that the primary preventive benefit of antihypertensive therapy in uncomplicated individuals is the direct result of the lower blood pressure (BP) rather than the choice of agents. In contrast, when comorbidities are present, therapeutic benefit is governed primarily by the appropriateness of the drug class for the comorbidity profile. As progressively lower BP levels are studied, conflicting results and uncertainties continue to emerge. Given the geometric nature of the BP-risk relationship, it is to be expected that benefits will be less dramatic at lower levels of BP. Conflicting results may emerge from intrinsic problems with clinical trials, including uncertainties related to confounded composite end points, interactions of comorbidities, selection bias from the heterogeneous population with hypertension, interindividual response differences, BP variation and measurement artifacts, multiple mechanisms of antihypertensive drugs, and other deficiencies in study design. The mandate for BP reduction remains strong in virtually all clinical situations. Because of clinical heterogeneity, however, no single drug class is preferred in all circumstances.

摘要

荟萃分析强烈表明,降压治疗在无并发症个体中的主要预防益处是血压降低的直接结果,而不是药物选择的结果。相比之下,当存在合并症时,治疗益处主要取决于药物类别是否适合合并症特征。随着研究不断深入到更低的血压水平,出现了相互矛盾的结果和不确定性。鉴于血压风险关系的几何性质,可以预期在更低的血压水平下,益处将不那么显著。临床试验中存在的固有问题可能会导致相互矛盾的结果,包括与复合终点混淆、合并症相互作用、高血压人群的选择偏差、个体间反应差异、血压变化和测量误差、降压药物的多种机制以及研究设计中的其他缺陷等不确定性。在几乎所有临床情况下,降低血压的要求仍然很强。然而,由于临床异质性,在所有情况下都没有一种药物类别是首选的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验