• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.强化血压控制对 2 型糖尿病的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 29;362(17):1575-85. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001286. Epub 2010 Mar 14.
2
[The SPRINT Research. A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control].[收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)研究。强化与标准血压控制的随机试验]
Vnitr Lek. 2016 Jan;62(1):44-7.
3
Intensive Blood-Pressure Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病患者的强化血压控制
N Engl J Med. 2025 Mar 27;392(12):1155-1167. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2412006. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
4
Evaluation of Optimal Diastolic Blood Pressure Range Among Adults With Treated Systolic Blood Pressure Less Than 130 mm Hg.收缩压治疗后低于130mmHg的成年人最佳舒张压范围的评估
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037554. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37554.
5
Lowering systolic blood pressure to less than 120 mm Hg versus less than 140 mm Hg in patients with high cardiovascular risk with and without diabetes or previous stroke: an open-label, blinded-outcome, randomised trial.在伴有或不伴有糖尿病或既往卒中的心血管高危患者中,将收缩压降低至 120mmHg 以下与降低至 140mmHg 以下:一项开放标签、盲法结局、随机试验。
Lancet. 2024 Jul 20;404(10449):245-255. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01028-6. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
6
Long-term effects of intensive glucose lowering on cardiovascular outcomes.强化血糖控制对心血管结局的长期影响。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 3;364(9):818-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1006524.
7
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化与标准血压控制的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
8
Pharmacological blood pressure lowering for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease across different levels of blood pressure: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis.降压药物治疗用于不同血压水平的心血管疾病一级和二级预防:一项个体参与者水平数据的荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2021 May 1;397(10285):1625-1636. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00590-0.
9
Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化与标准血压控制的试验最终报告。
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 20;384(20):1921-1930. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901281.
10
Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制对≥75岁成年人心血管疾病结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2673-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7050.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Documentation and Follow-Up of Elevated Blood Pressure in a Family Clinic: A Quality Improvement Project.改善家庭诊所中高血压的记录与随访:一项质量改进项目。
Cureus. 2025 Aug 9;17(8):e89711. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89711. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Bayesian variable selection for logistic regression with a differentially misclassified binary covariate.具有差异误分类二元协变量的逻辑回归的贝叶斯变量选择
Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2025.2496305.
3
Impact of Intensive Blood Pressure Control Versus Standard Control on Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.强化血压控制与标准血压控制对心血管结局的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2025 Jul 7;17(7):e87456. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87456. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Height matters: re-thinking blood pressure targets through physics, physiology and evolution.身高很重要:通过物理学、生理学和进化重新思考血压目标。
Clin Kidney J. 2025 Jul 18;18(8):sfaf226. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaf226. eCollection 2025 Aug.
5
A Risk Stratification Model for Predicting Benefits of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment: Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.一种用于预测强化血压治疗益处的风险分层模型:收缩压干预试验分析
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025 Aug;27(8):e70098. doi: 10.1111/jch.70098.
6
Interplay between triglyceride-glucose index and cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients with controlled blood pressure (SBP<140 mmHg): insights from the SPRINT trial.血压控制良好(收缩压<140 mmHg)的高血压患者中甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与心血管事件的相互作用:来自收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)的见解
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 16;16:1508667. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1508667. eCollection 2025.
7
Call to action: British and Irish hypertension society position statement on blood pressure treatment thresholds and targets.行动呼吁:英国和爱尔兰高血压学会关于血压治疗阈值和目标的立场声明
J Hum Hypertens. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1038/s41371-025-01055-z.
8
Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Diabetes and Previous Stroke: A Post-Hoc Analysis of ACCORD-BP Trial.糖尿病合并既往卒中患者的强化血压控制:ACCORD-BP试验的事后分析
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025 Jul;27(7):e70095. doi: 10.1111/jch.70095.
9
Association between estimated glucose disposal rate and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者中估计的葡萄糖处置率与主要不良心血管事件之间的关联。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 17;20(7):e0328252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328252. eCollection 2025.
10
Chronic Episodic Hypotension as a Cause of Chronic Kidney Disease.慢性发作性低血压作为慢性肾脏病的一个病因
Case Rep Med. 2025 Jul 1;2025:6651563. doi: 10.1155/carm/6651563. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus.2 型糖尿病的联合降脂治疗效果。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 29;362(17):1563-74. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001282. Epub 2010 Mar 14.
2
Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies.降压药物在心血管疾病预防中的应用:基于前瞻性流行病学研究预期的147项随机试验的荟萃分析
BMJ. 2009 May 19;338:b1665. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1665.
3
Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes.强化降糖对2型糖尿病的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2545-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802743. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
4
Effects of a fixed combination of perindopril and indapamide on macrovascular and microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the ADVANCE trial): a randomised controlled trial.培哚普利与吲达帕胺固定复方制剂对2型糖尿病患者大血管和微血管转归的影响(ADVANCE试验):一项随机对照试验
Lancet. 2007 Sep 8;370(9590):829-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61303-8.
5
Rationale and design for the blood pressure intervention of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial.糖尿病心血管风险控制行动(ACCORD)试验中血压干预的原理与设计。
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jun 18;99(12A):44i-55i. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.005. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
6
Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial: design and methods.糖尿病心血管风险控制行动(ACCORD)试验:设计与方法
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jun 18;99(12A):21i-33i. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.003. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
7
Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate.在肾脏病饮食改良研究方程中使用标准化血清肌酐值来估算肾小球滤过率。
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Aug 15;145(4):247-54. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00004.
8
The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report.美国国家高血压预防、检测、评估与治疗联合委员会第七次报告:JNC 7报告。
JAMA. 2003 May 21;289(19):2560-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.19.2560. Epub 2003 May 14.
9
Benefits and risks of more intensive blood pressure lowering in hypertensive patients of the HOT study with different risk profiles: does a J-shaped curve exist in smokers?高血压优化治疗(HOT)研究中不同风险特征的高血压患者强化降压的获益与风险:吸烟者中是否存在J型曲线?
J Hypertens. 2003 Apr;21(4):797-804. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200304000-00024.
10
Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study.收缩压与2型糖尿病大血管及微血管并发症的关联(英国前瞻性糖尿病研究36):前瞻性观察研究
BMJ. 2000 Aug 12;321(7258):412-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.412.

强化血压控制对 2 型糖尿病的影响。

Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 29;362(17):1575-85. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001286. Epub 2010 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1001286
PMID:20228401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4123215/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no evidence from randomized trials to support a strategy of lowering systolic blood pressure below 135 to 140 mm Hg in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We investigated whether therapy targeting normal systolic pressure (i.e., <120 mm Hg) reduces major cardiovascular events in participants with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular events.

METHODS

A total of 4733 participants with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to intensive therapy, targeting a systolic pressure of less than 120 mm Hg, or standard therapy, targeting a systolic pressure of less than 140 mm Hg. The primary composite outcome was nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes. The mean follow-up was 4.7 years.

RESULTS

After 1 year, the mean systolic blood pressure was 119.3 mm Hg in the intensive-therapy group and 133.5 mm Hg in the standard-therapy group. The annual rate of the primary outcome was 1.87% in the intensive-therapy group and 2.09% in the standard-therapy group (hazard ratio with intensive therapy, 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 1.06; P=0.20). The annual rates of death from any cause were 1.28% and 1.19% in the two groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.35; P=0.55). The annual rates of stroke, a prespecified secondary outcome, were 0.32% and 0.53% in the two groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.89; P=0.01). Serious adverse events attributed to antihypertensive treatment occurred in 77 of the 2362 participants in the intensive-therapy group (3.3%) and 30 of the 2371 participants in the standard-therapy group (1.3%) (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular events, targeting a systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg, as compared with less than 140 mm Hg, did not reduce the rate of a composite outcome of fatal and nonfatal major cardiovascular events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00000620.)

摘要

背景

没有随机试验的证据支持将收缩压降至 135 至 140mmHg 以下的策略用于 2 型糖尿病患者。我们研究了将目标收缩压设定为正常范围(即<120mmHg)的治疗方法是否可以降低心血管事件高危的 2 型糖尿病患者的主要心血管事件发生率。

方法

共有 4733 名 2 型糖尿病患者被随机分配到强化治疗组,目标收缩压<120mmHg;或标准治疗组,目标收缩压<140mmHg。主要复合结局是非致死性心肌梗死、非致死性卒中和心血管原因导致的死亡。平均随访时间为 4.7 年。

结果

治疗 1 年后,强化治疗组的平均收缩压为 119.3mmHg,标准治疗组为 133.5mmHg。强化治疗组的主要结局年发生率为 1.87%,标准治疗组为 2.09%(强化治疗的风险比为 0.88;95%置信区间为 0.73 至 1.06;P=0.20)。两组的任何原因死亡率分别为 1.28%和 1.19%(风险比为 1.07;95%置信区间为 0.85 至 1.35;P=0.55)。两组的卒中发生率(预先设定的次要结局)分别为 0.32%和 0.53%(风险比为 0.59;95%置信区间为 0.39 至 0.89;P=0.01)。强化治疗组 2362 名患者中有 77 例(3.3%)和标准治疗组 2371 名患者中有 30 例(1.3%)发生与降压治疗相关的严重不良事件(P<0.001)。

结论

与收缩压目标<140mmHg 相比,将心血管事件高危的 2 型糖尿病患者的收缩压目标设定为<120mmHg 并不能降低致死性和非致死性主要心血管事件的复合发生率。(ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT00000620。)