Tsai Yi-Ta, Leong Chau-Peng, Huang Yu-Chi, Kuo Shih-Hua, Wang Ho-Cheng, Yeh Hsiang-Chun, Lau Yiu-Chung
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung Medical Center, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chang Gung Med J. 2010 Sep-Oct;33(5):540-50.
Analysis of electromyographic (EMG) activities in the back during dynamic exercise is needed because more complex loading on the spine is created in comparison with that during static exercise. The purpose of this study is to investigate the difference in bilateral midback and low-back paraspinal muscle (PSM) activities during performance of different resistance isokinetic exercises in healthy subjects and those with scoliosis.
Forty-one healthy subjects and thirty-three subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) were enrolled. An isokinetic back system in combination with quantitative surface EMG was used to evaluate the dominant and nondominant PSM activities by analyzing the root mean square (RMS) during isokinetic extension and flexion exercise at velocities of 30 degree/s and 90 degree/s.
Significantly higher RMS of EMG were found in the dominant medial and lateral PSM of the lumbar region than the non-dominant muscles in the healthy control group and in those with AIS with smaller curves (<20 degrees) during isokinetic flexion and extension exercises. In AIS patients with larger curves (20 to 50 degrees), shifting of muscle activities from the dominant to the non-dominant side occurred during isokinetic exercises, and the EMG activities of the thoracic muscle were significantly higher on the non-dominant (concave) side than on the dominant (convex) side.
The bilateral PSM do not act symmetrically during isokinetic back exercises. The dominant lumbar PSM supply the major action in healthy subjects and patients with small curve scoliosis. For larger curve scoliosis, compensated muscle activity is needed in the midback when doing resistance exercises. More midback protection may be needed by scoliotic subjects with large curves during resistance exercise.
动态运动时背部肌电图(EMG)活动分析是必要的,因为与静态运动相比,脊柱所承受的负荷更为复杂。本研究旨在调查健康受试者和脊柱侧弯患者在进行不同阻力等速运动时双侧中背部和下背部椎旁肌(PSM)活动的差异。
招募了41名健康受试者和33名青少年特发性脊柱侧弯(AIS)患者。使用等速背部系统结合定量表面肌电图,通过分析在30度/秒和90度/秒速度下进行等速伸展和屈曲运动时的均方根(RMS)来评估优势侧和非优势侧PSM的活动。
在健康对照组以及曲线较小(<20度)的AIS患者中,等速屈伸运动时,腰椎区域优势侧的内侧和外侧PSM的EMG的RMS显著高于非优势侧肌肉。在曲线较大(20至50度)的AIS患者中,等速运动时肌肉活动从优势侧转移至非优势侧,并且非优势(凹)侧的胸肌EMG活动显著高于优势(凸)侧。
等速背部运动时双侧PSM的作用不对称。在健康受试者和小曲线脊柱侧弯患者中,优势侧腰椎PSM发挥主要作用。对于大曲线脊柱侧弯患者,进行抗阻运动时中背部需要代偿性肌肉活动。大曲线脊柱侧弯患者在抗阻运动时可能需要更多的中背部保护。