Harbach R E, Tang D B, Wirtz R A, Gingrich J B
Department of Entomology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington, DC 20307-5100.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1990 Dec;6(4):641-4.
Field tests were conducted to compare the effectiveness of 2 repellent formulations of N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (deet) in combination with permethrin-impregnated military uniforms against Culex sitiens and Aedes vigilax in Thailand. Repellency was determined during a 2 h crepuscular period using volunteers who had been treated with repellents 6, 8, 10, and 12 h prior to the end of each test period. An extended-duration repellent formulation (EDRF) containing 35% deet repelled significantly more Ae. vigilax than 75% deet in ethanol. Although not statistically significant, the EDRF also resulted in fewer biting attempts by Cx. sitiens. Neither formulation provided complete protection against either species 4-12 h post-application, but both provided greater overall protection against Ae. vigilax. Volunteers who wore treated uniforms without repellents were attacked by significantly fewer mosquitoes than controls.
在泰国进行了实地试验,以比较两种含N,N - 二乙基 - 3 - 甲基苯甲酰胺(避蚊胺)的驱避剂配方与氯菊酯浸渍军装联合使用对致倦库蚊和骚扰伊蚊的效果。在每个试验期结束前6、8、10和12小时用驱避剂处理过的志愿者在黄昏时段的2小时内测定驱避效果。含有35%避蚊胺的长效驱避剂配方(EDRF)比75%乙醇溶液中的避蚊胺能显著驱避更多的骚扰伊蚊。虽然无统计学意义,但EDRF也使致倦库蚊的叮咬尝试次数减少。两种配方在施用后4 - 12小时都不能对任何一种蚊虫提供完全防护,但两者对骚扰伊蚊都提供了更好的总体防护。穿着经处理军装但未使用驱避剂的志愿者受到的蚊虫攻击明显少于对照组。