Schreck C E, Kline D L
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Insects Affecting Man and Animals Research Laboratory, Gainesville, FL 32604.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1989 Mar;5(1):91-4.
Two experimental controlled-release repellent formulations containing 35% (3M) and 44% (Biotek) deet, respectively, were compared with a 75% standard formulation of deet used by the military. The military repellent was equal to or significantly better than the formulations in duration of protection against 2 mosquito species in laboratory and field tests, but the formulations contained only 47-59% the amount of deet in the military repellent. In all cases high levels of protection (greater than 95%) were measured, but because of high densities of biting mosquitoes in field tests, this level did not necessarily indicate few bites. In terms of mean bites/test/day by Anopheles quadrimaculatus in caged tests, the military repellent had fewest (2) and Biotek had most (41).
将两种分别含有35%(3M)和44%(Biotek)避蚊胺的实验性控释驱避剂配方,与军方使用的75%避蚊胺标准配方进行了比较。在实验室和野外试验中,军方驱避剂在针对两种蚊虫的防护时长方面与这些配方相当或显著更优,但这些配方所含避蚊胺的量仅为军方驱避剂的47%-59%。在所有情况下,均测得高水平的防护(大于95%),但由于野外试验中叮咬蚊虫的密度很高,这一水平并不一定意味着叮咬次数少。在笼养试验中,按四斑按蚊每天每试验的平均叮咬次数计算,军方驱避剂导致的叮咬次数最少(2次),而Biotek导致的叮咬次数最多(41次)。