Gupta R K, Sweeney A W, Rutledge L C, Cooper R D, Frances S P, Westrom D R
Letterman Army Institute of Research, Presidio of San Francisco, CA 94129.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1987 Dec;3(4):556-60.
Two topical controlled-release personal-use arthropod repellent formulations of diethyl methylbenzamide (deet) and permethrin-impregnated clothing were tested on human volunteers in a tropical rain forest near Innisfail, Queensland, Australia. The field trials were arranged in a four-way factorial design which compared fabric types, permethrin treatment and repellent treatments over a 14-hour test period. An analysis of variance with each factor treated as a fixed effect indicated that treatment of the clothing with permethrin and use of topical repellents were effective in preventing bites. The controlled release formulations were not significantly better than the current U.S. Army formulation of deet under field conditions. The repellent formulations and the permethrin-treated clothing used as one system provided better protection than the repellent formulations or permethrin-treated clothing used separately.
在澳大利亚昆士兰州因尼斯费尔附近的热带雨林中,对两种含有二乙甲苯酰胺(避蚊胺)的局部控释个人用节肢动物驱避剂配方以及浸渍氯菊酯的衣物进行了人体志愿者测试。现场试验采用四因素析因设计,在14小时的测试期内比较了织物类型、氯菊酯处理和驱避剂处理。将每个因素视为固定效应的方差分析表明,用氯菊酯处理衣物和使用局部驱避剂可有效防止叮咬。在野外条件下,控释配方并不比美国陆军目前的避蚊胺配方显著更好。作为一个系统使用的驱避剂配方和经氯菊酯处理的衣物比单独使用驱避剂配方或经氯菊酯处理的衣物提供了更好的保护。