Schreck C E, Kline D L
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Insects Affecting Man and Animals Research Laboratory, Gainesville, FL 32604.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1989 Mar;5(1):77-80.
Field tests evaluated repellent formulations containing deet in combination with permethrin-impregnated or untreated military uniforms against Aedes taeniorhynchus. No significant difference was determined between repellents in duration of protection whether or not permethrin-treated clothing was worn, but there were differences in efficacy relative to site of application. The head was the site of shorter duration of protection regardless of repellent tested. On repellent-treated skin, 12-30% of the bites were on arms, whereas 70-88% were on the head. When military repellent was used, the head was bitten 35% more often than with experimental repellents. On untreated clothing 80% of bites were through pants and 20% through shirts. Mean bites through untreated clothing were 0.7 bites/min/person (42/hr), whereas mean bites through permethrin-impregnated clothing were 0.0004/min/person (0.02/hr). Protection by permethrin-treated clothing relative to untreated clothing was 99.9%.
实地测试评估了含有避蚊胺并与氯菊酯浸渍或未处理的军装相结合的驱避剂配方对致倦库蚊的效果。无论是否穿着经氯菊酯处理的衣物,各驱避剂在保护时长方面均未发现显著差异,但在应用部位的效果存在差异。无论测试何种驱避剂,头部都是保护时长较短的部位。在使用驱避剂处理过的皮肤上,12% - 30%的叮咬发生在手臂,而70% - 88%发生在头部。使用军用驱避剂时,头部被叮咬的频率比使用实验性驱避剂时高35%。在未处理的衣物上,80%的叮咬发生在裤子部位,20%发生在衬衫部位。未处理衣物上的平均叮咬率为0.7次/分钟/人(42次/小时),而氯菊酯浸渍衣物上的平均叮咬率为0.0004次/分钟/人(0.02次/小时)。氯菊酯处理的衣物相对于未处理衣物的防护率为99.9%。