Mercer D W
Montefiore Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Immunol Ser. 1990;53:613-29.
The 10 isoenzyme markers discussed here represent those that in the author's judgment show promise as effective tumor markers. The relative usefulness of these isoenzymes as tumor markers is summarized in Table 6. Each isoenzyme is evaluated by a rating system, with a scale of 0-5 points in each of seven categories. The hypothetical ideal tumor marker received 5 points in all seven categories for a total score of 35. Unfortunately, less than perfect scores ranging from 9 to 26 were found for the 10 isoenzymes evaluated here. The five best isoenzymes were neuron-specific enolase (26 points), prostatic acid phosphatase (23 points), placental alkaline phosphatase (20 points), thymidine kinase 1 (16 points), and lactate dehydrogenase 1 (16 points). In general, low isoenzyme scores can be attributed to the problems exhibited by all tumor markers: insensitivity to early-stage malignancies and false-positive elevations in nonmalignant diseases. Nevertheless, each of the 10 isoenzymes described here has potential clinical usefulness to support a diagnosis of cancer and/or to assist in the monitoring of therapy.
本文讨论的10种同工酶标志物是作者认为有望成为有效肿瘤标志物的那些。这些同工酶作为肿瘤标志物的相对实用性总结于表6中。每种同工酶通过一个评分系统进行评估,在七个类别中的每一个类别中评分范围为0至5分。假设的理想肿瘤标志物在所有七个类别中均得5分,总分为35分。遗憾的是,本文评估的10种同工酶的得分均低于完美分数,范围在9至26分之间。五种最佳的同工酶分别是神经元特异性烯醇化酶(26分)、前列腺酸性磷酸酶(23分)、胎盘碱性磷酸酶(20分)、胸苷激酶1(16分)和乳酸脱氢酶1(16分)。一般来说,同工酶得分低可归因于所有肿瘤标志物都存在的问题:对早期恶性肿瘤不敏感以及在非恶性疾病中出现假阳性升高。然而,本文描述的10种同工酶中的每一种都具有潜在的临床实用性,可支持癌症诊断和/或协助治疗监测。