National Transplant Services, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, Melbourne, Australia.
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2011 Jan;25(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
Since the discovery of the HLA system 51 years ago, both the techniques for the detection of HLA antigens and the method of nomenclature for cataloguing them have changed dramatically. Initially serology was the sole technological tool available to describe the polymorphism of the class 1 and later the class 2 loci. Numbers were assigned to antigens as they were described and as serologic techniques that improved "subtypes" of the original antigens were described. With sequencing of HLA alleles, further polymorphisms were described, and it became evident that the degree of polymorphism was much greater than had hitherto been realized. Sequence differences were detected between alleles, which did not appear to provoke antibody responses but were clearly recognized by responding T cells. A new method of nomenclature was devised, which assigned 2 sets of numbers to each allele. The first 2 numbers indicated the serologic group to which the allele belonged, whereas the second set of 2 numbers was assigned in a numerical progression as each new allele was described. In addition, letters were introduced at the end of each allele where they were known to be nonexpressed or have low levels of cell expression. The limitation of this system is that it only caters for 99 alleles in each serologic group, and this has now been exceeded in some cases. The World Health Organization Nomenclature Committee for factors of the HLA system introduced a modification of the current nomenclature in April 2010 which uses colons to separate the numbers that has the effect of delimiting the number of alleles, which can be assigned to each serologic group. Due to the extensive polymorphism of the HLA genes, sequencing frequently results in ambiguous combinations of alleles and also "strings" of possible alleles due to polymorphisms in nonsequenced gene locations. The reporting in such instances has been simplified to some extent by the introduction of a lettering system to indicate a particular "string." The nomenclature of the HLA system can be confusing to those outside the HLA scientific community. It is important, however, that physicians, particularly those involved in transplantation, have a working knowledge of the nomenclature. It is important in solid organ transplantation in terms of interpreting the relevance of HLA antibodies in cases where there are clear demonstrations in patients of allele-specific antibodies. It is critical in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation where allele level matching is imperative and where decisions have to be made regarding the likelihood of possible sequence mismatches and the clinical relevance of nonexpression or low expression of HLA allelic products.
自 51 年前发现 HLA 系统以来,用于检测 HLA 抗原的技术和对其进行编目的命名方法都发生了巨大变化。最初,血清学是唯一可用于描述 1 类和后来 2 类基因座多态性的技术手段。随着描述的抗原数量的增加,以及描述的血清学技术的改进,“亚型”的原始抗原也随之增加。随着 HLA 等位基因的测序,进一步描述了多态性,并且显然发现多态性的程度比以前所认识到的要大得多。在等位基因之间检测到序列差异,这些差异似乎不会引起抗体反应,但显然会被反应性 T 细胞识别。设计了一种新的命名法,为每个等位基因分配 2 组数字。前 2 个数字表示等位基因所属的血清学组,而第二组 2 个数字则按数值顺序分配,每次描述新的等位基因时都会增加。此外,在每个等位基因的末尾引入字母,在这些位置,它们被认为是不表达或细胞表达水平低的。该系统的局限性在于,它只能为每个血清学组中的 99 个等位基因分配编号,而在某些情况下,这一数字已经超过了。世界卫生组织 HLA 系统因子命名委员会于 2010 年 4 月对当前命名法进行了修改,使用冒号将数字分隔开,从而有效地限定了可以为每个血清学组分配的等位基因数量。由于 HLA 基因的广泛多态性,测序结果通常会导致等位基因的组合不确定,并且由于未测序基因位置的多态性,也会导致“等位基因串”。由于引入了字母系统来指示特定的“等位基因串”,因此在这种情况下,报告在某种程度上得到了简化。HLA 系统的命名法对于 HLA 科学界以外的人来说可能会令人困惑。然而,重要的是,医生,特别是参与移植的医生,应该对命名法有一个基本的了解。在实体器官移植中,解释 HLA 抗体的相关性非常重要,特别是在患者中有明确的等位基因特异性抗体的情况下。在造血干细胞移植中,等位基因水平匹配至关重要,必须做出关于可能的序列不匹配和 HLA 等位基因产物不表达或低表达的临床相关性的决策。