• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在腹腔镜抗反流手术中同时进行胆囊切除术是否安全?

Is concomitant cholecystectomy safe during laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery?

作者信息

Toydemir Toygar, Yerdel Mehmet Ali

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Surgery Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010 Dec;20(10):831-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0226. Epub 2010 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2010.0226
PMID:21034274
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study is to prospectively evaluate the safety of concomitant cholecystectomy during laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS).

METHODS

A total of 1000 patients underwent LARS between May 2004 and August 2009. Patients who had a LARS procedure alone were defined as group A and those who had cholecystectomy during the LARS were defined as group B. All data, including demographics, operative details, perioperative complications, and outcomes, were recorded to the prospective database. Chi-square and t-test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There were 934 (93.4%) patients in group A and 66 (6.6%) in group B. Cholelithiasis (n = 48) and gallbladder polyp larger than 10 mm (n = 18) were the indications for cholecystectomy. Demographic characteristics were similar among the groups. There were no mortality and conversion. The mean operating time was 50 minutes for group A and 80 minutes for group B (P = 0.0001). The mean hospital stay was 1 day for each group. The mean follow-up was 35 and 38 months for groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.195). Esophageal perforation, jejunal perforation, and pulmonary emboli were the major complications and were seen only in group A (P = 0.790). All other peroperative minor complications and postoperative dysphagia, bloating, and reflux recurrence were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

LARS and cholecystectomy can be performed safely during the same session without increasing the rates of morbidity and recurrence of reflux.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是前瞻性评估腹腔镜抗反流手术(LARS)同期行胆囊切除术的安全性。

方法

2004年5月至2009年8月期间,共有1000例患者接受了LARS。单纯接受LARS手术的患者被定义为A组,在LARS期间接受胆囊切除术的患者被定义为B组。所有数据,包括人口统计学资料、手术细节、围手术期并发症和结局,均记录在前瞻性数据库中。采用卡方检验和t检验进行统计学分析。

结果

A组有934例(93.4%)患者,B组有66例(6.6%)患者。胆囊结石(n = 48)和直径大于10 mm的胆囊息肉(n = 18)是胆囊切除术的指征。两组间人口统计学特征相似。无死亡病例和中转开腹病例。A组平均手术时间为50分钟,B组为80分钟(P = 0.0001)。两组平均住院时间均为1天。A组和B组的平均随访时间分别为35个月和38个月(P = 0.195)。食管穿孔、空肠穿孔和肺栓塞是主要并发症,仅在A组出现(P = 0.790)。两组间所有其他术中轻微并发症以及术后吞咽困难、腹胀和反流复发情况相似(P > 0.05)。

结论

LARS和胆囊切除术可在同一次手术中安全进行,且不增加发病率和反流复发率。

相似文献

1
Is concomitant cholecystectomy safe during laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery?在腹腔镜抗反流手术中同时进行胆囊切除术是否安全?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010 Dec;20(10):831-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0226. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
2
A randomized trial on endoscopic full-thickness gastroplication versus laparoscopic antireflux surgery in GERD patients without hiatal hernias.一项针对无食管裂孔疝的胃食管反流病患者进行内镜全层胃折叠术与腹腔镜抗反流手术对比的随机试验。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Apr;23(2):212-22. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182827f79.
3
Does major depression in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease affect the outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery?胃食管反流病患者的重度抑郁症会影响腹腔镜抗反流手术的结果吗?
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jan;17(1):55-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8504-8. Epub 2002 Sep 23.
4
Laparoscopic Nissen versus Toupet fundoplication: assessment of operative outcomes.腹腔镜尼森术与图佩特胃底折叠术:手术结果评估
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 Oct;21(8):669-76. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0038. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
5
Is laparoscopic antireflux surgery safe and effective in obese patients?腹腔镜抗反流手术在肥胖患者中安全有效吗?
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan;26(1):86-95. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1832-9. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
6
Outpatient versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single center clinical analysis.门诊与住院腹腔镜胆囊切除术:单中心临床分析。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2010 Feb;9(1):60-4.
7
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly patients. An experience at Liaquat University Hospital Jamshoro.老年患者的腹腔镜胆囊切除术。在詹姆肖罗利亚卡特大学医院的经验。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2007 Oct-Dec;19(4):45-8.
8
Endoscopic stapling in comparison to laparoscopic fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.内镜吻合术与腹腔镜胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病的比较。
Dig Endosc. 2014 Jan;26(1):37-42. doi: 10.1111/den.12081. Epub 2013 Apr 7.
9
Does sex affect the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A retrospective analysis of single center experience.性别会影响腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果吗?一项基于单中心经验的回顾性分析。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013 Feb;6(1):21-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5910.2012.00152.x. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
10
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients.肝硬化患者的腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Hepatogastroenterology. 1997 Nov-Dec;44(18):1584-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic Repair of a Type IV Hiatal Hernia Using Gore Bio-A® Mesh: A Case Report and Literature Review.使用戈尔生物A®补片腹腔镜修复IV型食管裂孔疝:病例报告及文献综述
Cureus. 2025 Jul 6;17(7):e87391. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87391. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Prevalence of gallstones in 1,229 patients submitted to surgical laparoscopic treatment of GERD and esophageal achalasia: associated cholecystectomy was a safe procedure.1229例接受腹腔镜手术治疗胃食管反流病和食管贲门失弛缓症患者的胆结石患病率:同期行胆囊切除术是一种安全的手术。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2015 Apr-Jun;28(2):113-6. doi: 10.1590/S0102-67202015000200007.