• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜吻合术与腹腔镜胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病的比较。

Endoscopic stapling in comparison to laparoscopic fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Faculty of Bezmi Alem University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Dig Endosc. 2014 Jan;26(1):37-42. doi: 10.1111/den.12081. Epub 2013 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1111/den.12081
PMID:23560891
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The SRS(TM) Endoscopic Stapling System (Medigus Ltd, Omer, Israel) is a novel method for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The present study assessed the safety and efficacy of SRS compared with laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 27 participants, 11 underwent SRS and 16 LARS. Symptoms were assessed using Velanovich GERD-health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) scores. The groups were compared in reference to operation time, improvement in GERD-HRQL scores, and postoperative course. Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney-U-tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Of 16 (59.3%) male and 11 (40.7%) female patients, mean age was 39.6 (range: 24-60) years and mean body mass index was 26.2 kg/m(2) . Both groups were statistically similar. An esophageal perforation observed in the SRS group completely recovered after over-the-scope clipping. Procedure times for SRSand LARS were 89 and 47 min, respectively (P < 0.05). Mean discharge time was longer for SRS than LARS (3 days vs 1.2 days, P < 0.05). However, this difference disappeared with the exclusion of a complicated patient with long hospitalization in the SRS group. During 6 months mean follow up, proton-pump inhibitor use was insignificantly higher in the SRS group (P > 0.05). Mean GERD-HRQL scores dropped in 87% and in 64% of patients (P > 0.05) from 29.3 to 4.1 and from 24.8 to 8.9 (P = 0.016) in LARS and SRS groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The short-term results of SRS are promising. The forthcoming new-generation devices and increasing experience may further improve efficacy and decrease untoward effects.

摘要

背景

SRS(TM)内镜吻合系统(Medigus Ltd,Omer,以色列)是一种治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)的新方法。本研究评估了 SRS 与腹腔镜抗反流手术(LARS)相比的安全性和疗效。

患者和方法

27 名参与者中,11 名接受了 SRS,16 名接受了 LARS。使用 Velanovich 胃食管反流病健康相关生活质量(GERD-HRQL)评分评估症状。比较两组的手术时间、GERD-HRQL 评分改善情况和术后过程。使用卡方和曼-惠特尼 U 检验进行统计学分析。

结果

16 名(59.3%)男性和 11 名(40.7%)女性患者,平均年龄为 39.6(范围:24-60)岁,平均体重指数为 26.2kg/m²。两组在统计学上相似。SRS 组观察到食管穿孔,经内镜下夹闭完全恢复。SRS 和 LARS 的手术时间分别为 89 和 47 分钟(P<0.05)。SRS 的平均出院时间长于 LARS(3 天比 1.2 天,P<0.05)。然而,在排除 SRS 组一名住院时间长的复杂患者后,这种差异消失了。在 6 个月的平均随访期间,SRS 组质子泵抑制剂的使用明显更高(P>0.05)。LARS 和 SRS 组的患者分别有 87%和 64%的患者(P>0.05)的 GERD-HRQL 评分从 29.3 分降至 4.1 分和从 24.8 分降至 8.9 分(P=0.016)。

结论

SRS 的短期结果很有希望。新一代设备和不断增加的经验可能会进一步提高疗效并减少不良影响。

相似文献

1
Endoscopic stapling in comparison to laparoscopic fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.内镜吻合术与腹腔镜胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病的比较。
Dig Endosc. 2014 Jan;26(1):37-42. doi: 10.1111/den.12081. Epub 2013 Apr 7.
2
A randomized trial on endoscopic full-thickness gastroplication versus laparoscopic antireflux surgery in GERD patients without hiatal hernias.一项针对无食管裂孔疝的胃食管反流病患者进行内镜全层胃折叠术与腹腔镜抗反流手术对比的随机试验。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Apr;23(2):212-22. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182827f79.
3
Does major depression in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease affect the outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery?胃食管反流病患者的重度抑郁症会影响腹腔镜抗反流手术的结果吗?
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jan;17(1):55-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8504-8. Epub 2002 Sep 23.
4
Endoscopic fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: initial experience.内镜胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病:初步经验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Jan;143(1):228-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.008. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
5
Evaluation of postoperative long-term quality of life after laparoscopic anterior partial fundoplication in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.腹腔镜胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病术后长期生活质量评估。
Dig Surg. 2009;26(5):413-7. doi: 10.1159/000235959. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
6
Quality of life for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease 2 years after laparoscopic fundoplication. Evaluation of the results obtained during the initial experience.腹腔镜胃底折叠术两年后胃食管反流病患者的生活质量。对初次手术经验所得结果的评估。
Surg Endosc. 2002 Nov;16(11):1555-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9223-2. Epub 2002 Jun 20.
7
Ten-year outcome of laparoscopic and conventional nissen fundoplication: randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜与传统尼氏胃底折叠术的十年随访结果:随机临床试验
Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):698-706. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bcdaa7.
8
Quality of life after laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Preliminary study.腹腔镜胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病后的生活质量。初步研究。
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2013 Nov-Dec;108(6):788-93.
9
Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery.比较开放手术与腹腔镜抗反流手术的随机临床试验的Meta分析
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jun;104(6):1548-61; quiz 1547, 1562. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.176. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
10
Laparoscopic gastric bypass after antireflux surgery for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in morbidly obese patients: initial experience.腹腔镜胃旁路手术治疗病态肥胖患者胃食管反流病的抗反流手术后:初步经验
Obes Surg. 2004 Nov-Dec;14(10):1373-80. doi: 10.1381/0960892042583950.

引用本文的文献

1
Problems with repairing gut sphincters malfunctions.修复肠道括约肌功能障碍存在的问题。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Aug 27;16(8):2396-2408. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2396.
2
Endoscopic plication compared to laparoscopic fundoplication in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜折叠术与腹腔镜胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):5791-5806. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10202-x. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
3
Anti-reflux mucosectomy for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
抗反流黏膜切除术治疗难治性胃食管反流病:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2022 Jun 10;10(6):E854-E864. doi: 10.1055/a-1802-0220. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Endoscopic anti-reflux therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease.内镜抗反流治疗胃食管反流病。
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Oct 21;27(39):6601-6614. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i39.6601.
5
Endoscopic Treatments of GERD.胃食管反流病的内镜治疗
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;16(1):58-71. doi: 10.1007/s11938-018-0170-6.
6
Endoscopic Options for Gastroesophageal Reflux: Where Are We Now and What Does the Future Hold?胃食管反流的内镜治疗选择:我们目前的状况及未来走向?
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016 Sep;18(9):47. doi: 10.1007/s11894-016-0521-1.
7
Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.难治性胃食管反流病。
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2015 Feb;3(1):41-53. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gou061. Epub 2014 Sep 30.