Follansbee-Junger Katherine, Janicke David M, Sallinen Bethany J
College ofPublic Health and Health Professions, University ofFlorida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Nov;110(11):1653-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.08.005.
Behavioral interventions targeting children with overweight have been successful in facilitating weight loss; however, there is concern that these programs produce disordered eating attitudes among youth.
The purpose of this research was to determine whether youth with overweight receiving one of two behavioral interventions were more likely to report an increase in disordered eating attitudes over time compared to a waitlist control and to determine psychosocial predictors of eating-disordered attitudes at 6-month follow-up.
Participants were randomized to one of two behavioral lifestyle interventions or a waitlist control. Data were collected at baseline, post-treatment, and 6-month follow-up.
PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Participants were 68 youths with overweight, aged 8 to 13 years, and their parent(s) who lived in rural north central Florida. The project ran from January 2006 to January 2008.
Each treatment condition consisted of 12 group sessions over 16 weeks.
Parents completed a demographic form and the Child Feeding Questionnaire. Children completed the Children's Eating Attitudes Test, Schwartz Peer Victimization Scale, and Children's Body Image Scale.
Mixed 2×2 analyses of variance were used to examine the effect of treatment on eating attitudes. Hierarchical linear regression was used to assess whether baseline levels of psychosocial variables predicted disordered eating attitudes at follow-up, controlling for baseline eating attitudes and treatment condition.
Youth who participated in the behavioral interventions did not report significant increases in disordered eating attitudes over time compared to the waitlist control. Across all conditions, higher levels of body dissatisfaction, peer victimization, parent restrictive feeding practices, and concern for child weight at baseline predicted higher levels of disordered eating attitudes at follow-up.
These findings do not provide evidence that behavioral interventions lead to an increase in unhealthy eating attitudes and behaviors. Future research should examine the effects of incorporating eating disorder prevention in pediatric weight management programs.
针对超重儿童的行为干预在促进体重减轻方面已取得成功;然而,人们担心这些项目会在青少年中产生饮食失调态度。
本研究的目的是确定接受两种行为干预之一的超重青少年与候补对照组相比,随着时间的推移是否更有可能报告饮食失调态度增加,并确定在6个月随访时饮食失调态度的心理社会预测因素。
参与者被随机分配到两种行为生活方式干预之一或候补对照组。在基线、治疗后和6个月随访时收集数据。
参与者/地点:参与者是68名年龄在8至13岁之间的超重青少年及其居住在佛罗里达州中北部农村的父母。该项目从2006年1月持续到2008年1月。
每个治疗条件包括在16周内进行12次小组会议。
父母填写了一份人口统计学表格和儿童喂养问卷。儿童完成了儿童饮食态度测试、施瓦茨同伴受害量表和儿童身体意象量表。
采用混合2×2方差分析来检验治疗对饮食态度的影响。采用分层线性回归来评估心理社会变量的基线水平是否能预测随访时的饮食失调态度,同时控制基线饮食态度和治疗条件。
与候补对照组相比,参与行为干预的青少年随着时间的推移并未报告饮食失调态度有显著增加。在所有条件下,基线时较高的身体不满、同伴受害、父母限制性喂养行为以及对儿童体重的关注预测了随访时较高的饮食失调态度水平。
这些发现没有提供证据表明行为干预会导致不健康饮食态度和行为的增加。未来的研究应该考察在儿科体重管理项目中纳入饮食失调预防措施的效果。