Poppert Katrina M, Patton Susana R, Borner Kelsey B, Davis Ann M, Dreyer Gillette Meredith L
Clinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kansas Medical Center, and Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA Clinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kansas Medical Center, and Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA
Clinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kansas Medical Center, and Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA Clinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kansas Medical Center, and Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2015 Jun;40(5):475-86. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu117. Epub 2015 Jan 25.
This systematic review evaluates the utility and psychometric properties of pediatric mealtime assessments (direct observation and parent-report measures) using evidence-based criteria developed by the Division 54 Evidence-Based Assessment Task Force.
Measures of mealtime behavior used in at least one chronic illness pediatric population were eligible for inclusion. A total of 23 assessment measures were reviewed (16 parent-/self-report; 7 direct observation).
3 parent-report and 4 direct observation measures were classified as well-established, 3 met criteria for approaching well-established, and 13 were categorized as promising. Measures have been primarily used in children with feeding disorders, cystic fibrosis, and autism spectrum disorders.
Overall, the literature of pediatric mealtime assessment tools shows a strong evidence base for many direct observation methods and subjective parent-report measures. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses are available for some measures; recommendations for future validation research and measure development across pediatric populations are discussed.
本系统评价使用第54分会循证评估特别工作组制定的循证标准,评估儿科进餐时间评估(直接观察和家长报告测量)的效用和心理测量特性。
至少在一个患有慢性病的儿科人群中使用的进餐时间行为测量方法符合纳入标准。共审查了23种评估方法(16种家长/自我报告;7种直接观察)。
3种家长报告和4种直接观察方法被归类为已确立,3种符合接近已确立的标准,13种被归类为有前景。这些方法主要用于患有喂养障碍、囊性纤维化和自闭症谱系障碍的儿童。
总体而言,儿科进餐时间评估工具的文献表明,许多直接观察方法和主观家长报告测量方法有很强的证据基础。一些测量方法可进行探索性和验证性因素分析;讨论了未来针对儿科人群进行验证研究和测量方法开发的建议。