• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青霉素在儿童良性皮疹中的作用:一项基于药物再激发的前瞻性研究。

The role of penicillin in benign skin rashes in childhood: a prospective study based on drug rechallenge.

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent, University Hospitals of Geneva and Medical School of the University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Jan;127(1):218-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.08.025. Epub 2010 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2010.08.025
PMID:21035175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7126001/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delayed-onset urticarial or maculopapular rashes are frequently observed in children treated with β-lactams. Many are labeled "allergic" without reliable testing.

OBJECTIVE

Determine the etiology of these rashes by exploring both infectious and allergic causes.

METHODS

Children presenting to the emergency department with delayed-onset urticarial or maculopapular rashes were enrolled. Acute and convalescent sera were obtained for viral screening along with a throat swab. Subjects underwent intradermal and patch skin testing for β-lactams 2 months after presentation. Anti-β-lactam blood allergy tests were also obtained. All subjects underwent an oral challenge test (OCT) with the culprit antibiotic.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight children were enrolled between 2006 and 2008. There were 11 (12.5%) positive intradermal and no positive patch tests. There were 2 (2.3%) positive blood allergy tests. There were 6 (6.8%) subjects with a positive OCT, 2 were intradermal-negative, and 4 were intradermal-positive. No OCT reactions were more severe than the index event. Most subjects had at least 1 positive viral study, 54 (65.9%) in the OCT negative group.

CONCLUSION

In this situation, β-lactam allergy is clearly overdiagnosed because the skin rash is only rarely reproducible (6.8%) by a subsequent challenge. Viral infections may be an important factor in many of these rashes. OCTs were positive in a minority of intradermal skin test-positive subjects. Patch testing and blood allergy testing provided no useful information. OCTs should be considered in all children who develop a delayed-onset urticarial or maculopapular rash during treatment with a β-lactam.

摘要

背景

β-内酰胺类治疗后常出现迟发性荨麻疹或斑丘疹。许多被标记为“过敏”,但缺乏可靠的检测。

目的

通过探索感染和过敏原因,确定这些皮疹的病因。

方法

招募在急诊科就诊的迟发性荨麻疹或斑丘疹患儿。在出现皮疹后 2 个月时,采集急性和恢复期血清进行病毒筛查和咽拭子检查。进行β-内酰胺类皮内和斑贴试验,还进行了抗β-内酰胺血过敏检测。所有患儿均进行了可疑抗生素的口服激发试验(OCT)。

结果

2006 年至 2008 年期间共纳入 88 例患儿。皮内试验 11 例(12.5%)阳性,无斑贴试验阳性。血过敏检测 2 例阳性。OCT 阳性 6 例(6.8%),2 例皮内试验阴性,4 例皮内试验阳性。OCT 反应均未比原发病更严重。大多数患儿至少有 1 项阳性病毒研究,OCT 阴性组中 54 例(65.9%)。

结论

在这种情况下,β-内酰胺过敏明显被过度诊断,因为皮肤皮疹仅在少数情况下(6.8%)通过随后的激发试验重现。病毒感染可能是这些皮疹的重要因素。皮内试验阳性的少数患儿 OCT 阳性。斑贴试验和血过敏检测没有提供有用的信息。OCT 应考虑用于所有在β-内酰胺治疗期间发生迟发性荨麻疹或斑丘疹的患儿。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe7e/7126001/b2b5d202185f/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe7e/7126001/b2b5d202185f/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe7e/7126001/b2b5d202185f/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of penicillin in benign skin rashes in childhood: a prospective study based on drug rechallenge.青霉素在儿童良性皮疹中的作用:一项基于药物再激发的前瞻性研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Jan;127(1):218-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.08.025. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
2
Allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics in children.儿童对β-内酰胺类抗生素的过敏反应。
Pediatrics. 1999 Oct;104(4):e45. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.4.e45.
3
Aminopenicillin allergy.氨基青霉素过敏。
Arch Dis Child. 1997 Jun;76(6):513-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.76.6.513.
4
Risk Factors of Challenge-Proven Beta-Lactam Allergy in Children with Immediate and Non-Immediate Mild Cutaneous Reactions.有即时和非即时轻度皮肤反应的儿童经挑战证实的β-内酰胺类过敏的危险因素。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2023;184(6):539-549. doi: 10.1159/000529084. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
5
Diagnosing nonimmediate reactions to penicillins by in vivo tests.通过体内试验诊断对青霉素的非即刻反应。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2002 Oct;129(2):169-74. doi: 10.1159/000065876.
6
Non-immediate reactions to beta-lactams: diagnostic value of skin testing and drug provocation test.β-内酰胺类药物的非即刻反应:皮肤试验和药物激发试验的诊断价值
Clin Exp Allergy. 2008 May;38(5):822-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.02961.x. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
7
A diagnostic protocol for evaluating nonimmediate reactions to aminopenicillins.一种评估对氨基青霉素非即时反应的诊断方案。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Jun;103(6):1186-90. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70197-1.
8
Clindamycin-induced Maculopapular Exanthema with Preferential Involvement of Striae Distensae: A Koebner phenomenon?克林霉素诱发的斑丘疹伴膨胀纹优先受累:同形反应现象?
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2018 Apr;26(1):61-63.
9
Non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions to beta-lactam antibiotics in children - our 10-year experience in allergy work-up.儿童对β-内酰胺类抗生素的非速发型超敏反应——我们在过敏检查方面的10年经验
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2016 Aug;27(5):533-8. doi: 10.1111/pai.12565. Epub 2016 May 6.
10
The use of skin testing in the investigation of cutaneous adverse drug reactions.皮肤试验在皮肤药物不良反应调查中的应用。
Br J Dermatol. 1998 Jul;139(1):49-58. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02313.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug hypersensitivity reactions in children in clinical practice: A WAO Statement.临床实践中儿童药物过敏反应:世界过敏组织声明
World Allergy Organ J. 2025 Aug 29;18(9):101087. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2025.101087. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Peritonsillar abscess in children: A retrospective analysis on surgical and antimicrobial approaches.儿童扁桃体周围脓肿:手术及抗菌治疗方法的回顾性分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 7;20(7):e0324276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324276. eCollection 2025.
3
Recommendations on how to proceed in case of suspected allergy to penicillin/β-lactam antibiotics: Position paper of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) in cooperation with the German Society for Pediatric Allergology (GPA), Austrian Society for Allergology and Immunology (ÖGAI) and the Swiss Society for Allergology and Immunology (SGAI).

本文引用的文献

1
New respiratory enterovirus and recombinant rhinoviruses among circulating picornaviruses.流行的小核糖核酸病毒中的新型呼吸道肠道病毒和重组鼻病毒
Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 May;15(5):719-26. doi: 10.3201/eid1505.081286.
2
Molecular mechanisms of maculopapular exanthema.斑丘疹性皮疹的分子机制
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2009 Jun;22(3):272-8. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3283298e62.
3
Skin testing and drug provocation in the diagnosis of nonimmediate reactions to aminopenicillins in children.儿童对氨基青霉素非速发型反应诊断中的皮肤试验和药物激发试验
关于疑似对青霉素/β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏时如何处理的建议:德国变态反应学与临床免疫学会(DGAKI)与德国儿童变态反应学会(GPA)、奥地利变态反应学与免疫学学会(ÖGAI)以及瑞士变态反应学与免疫学学会(SGAI)合作发布的立场文件。
Allergol Select. 2025 Mar 6;9:28-39. doi: 10.5414/ALX02531E. eCollection 2025.
4
Drug allergy.药物过敏
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2025 Jan 22;20(Suppl 3):78. doi: 10.1186/s13223-024-00936-1.
5
Resensitization-Should Repeat Testing Be Performed in Patients Undergoing Penicillin Allergy Evaluations? A Pro-Con Debate.重新致敏——对正在接受青霉素过敏评估的患者应进行重复检测吗?一场正反方辩论。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2025 May;13(5):1004-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.12.043. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
6
Direct oral provocation test with beta-lactams in Brazilian children and adolescents.巴西儿童和青少年使用β-内酰胺类药物的直接口服激发试验。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2025 May-Jun;101(3):381-387. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2024.11.003. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
7
Comparing pharmacists versus allergists in low-risk penicillin allergy delabelling: The Hong Kong Penicillin Allergy Pharmacist Initiative (HK-PAPI).低风险青霉素过敏解除标签认定中药剂师与过敏症专科医生的比较:香港青霉素过敏药剂师倡议(HK-PAPI)
World Allergy Organ J. 2024 Nov 21;17(12):101003. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.101003. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
A call to address penicillin allergy labels in patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplants: How to avoid rash decisions.呼吁解决造血干细胞移植患者的青霉素过敏标签问题:如何避免仓促决策。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2024 Oct;26(5):e14350. doi: 10.1111/tid.14350. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
9
Risk factors for drug hypersensitivity reactions in children.儿童药物过敏反应的危险因素。
Ital J Pediatr. 2024 Jul 15;50(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13052-024-01694-x.
10
"Delabeling" by direct provocation testing in children and adolescents with a suspected history of a delayed reaction to β-lactam antibiotics: Consensus paper of Gesellschaft für pädiatrische Allergologie und Umweltmedizin (GPAU), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allergologie und klinische Immunologie (DGAKI), and Ärzteverband deutscher Allergologen (ÄDA).针对疑似有β-内酰胺类抗生素迟发反应病史的儿童和青少年,通过直接激发试验进行“脱敏”:德国儿科过敏与环境医学协会(GPAU)、德国过敏与临床免疫学会(DGAKI)以及德国过敏科医生协会(ÄDA)的共识文件
Allergol Select. 2024 May 31;8:206-211. doi: 10.5414/ALX02480E. eCollection 2024.
Allergy. 2009 Feb;64(2):229-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01903.x.
4
Respiratory viruses in bronchoalveolar lavage: a hospital-based cohort study in adults.支气管肺泡灌洗中的呼吸道病毒:一项基于医院的成人队列研究
Thorax. 2009 May;64(5):399-404. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.105155. Epub 2009 Jan 27.
5
Skin testing and oral penicillin challenge in patients with a history of remote penicillin allergy.有青霉素远期过敏史患者的皮肤试验及口服青霉素激发试验
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Jan;100(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60402-4.
6
Amoxicillin-induced exanthema in patients with infectious mononucleosis: allergy or transient immunostimulation?传染性单核细胞增多症患者中阿莫西林诱发的皮疹:过敏还是短暂免疫刺激?
Allergy. 2007 Dec;62(12):1474-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01518.x.
7
Allergy to betalactam antibiotics in children: a prospective follow-up study in retreated children after negative responses in skin and challenge tests.儿童对β-内酰胺类抗生素的过敏反应:一项针对皮肤试验和激发试验呈阴性反应的复治儿童的前瞻性随访研究。
Allergy. 2007 Jan;62(1):42-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01246.x.
8
Soluble FAS ligand: a discriminating feature between drug-induced skin eruptions and viral exanthemas.可溶性FAS配体:药物性皮疹与病毒疹之间的鉴别特征。
J Invest Dermatol. 2007 Apr;127(4):802-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700648. Epub 2006 Nov 30.
9
Diagnosis of nonimmediate reactions to beta-lactam antibiotics.β-内酰胺类抗生素非速发型反应的诊断
Allergy. 2004 Nov;59(11):1153-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00678.x.
10
[Incidence and clinical characteristics of maculopapular exanthemas of viral aetiology].[病毒病因性斑丘疹性皮疹的发病率及临床特征]
Aten Primaria. 2003 Nov 30;32(9):517-23. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(03)70781-1.