• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

按效付费步步走:MIMIQ 模型介绍。

Pay-for-performance step-by-step: introduction to the MIMIQ model.

机构信息

Center for Health Services and Nursing Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 4th floor, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2011 Sep;102(1):8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.09.014. Epub 2010 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.09.014
PMID:21035228
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Pay-for-performance is increasingly used as a system intervention to support quality improvement. Programs are however developed, implemented and evaluated in a heterogeneous way. This is partly due to the broad and disparate theoretical and empirical foundation of P4P practice, which is rapidly evolving. This paper guides the reader through the essential steps which should be taken into consideration when setting up a P4P program. To this end a model called 'Model for Implementing and Monitoring Incentives for Quality' (MIMIQ) is presented.

METHODS

Literature review was performed with a search of multiple databases, reference screening and expert consultation.

RESULTS

Central to the step-by-step approach is a Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle which incorporates communication, implementation and evaluation as key phases next to program development. In addition, the model explains how the decision making and results of each phase is modified by contextual factors. The model puts emphasis on quality and quality measurement as first items to develop. Only after these are in place, the development of the incentive component can be addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

The model presents guidance for designing and implementing P4P programs in a practically structured way. According to future findings the MIMIQ model will continuously evolve as an up to date P4P policy and practice tool.

摘要

目的

绩效薪酬制作为一种支持质量改进的系统干预手段,其应用日益广泛。然而,此类方案的开发、实施和评估方式却存在差异,这在一定程度上是由于其理论和实践基础广泛且多样,且还在迅速发展。本文旨在为读者提供一份指南,阐明实施和监测质量激励措施时应考虑的基本步骤,为此引入了一个名为“质量激励措施实施和监测模型”(MIMIQ)的模型。

方法

通过对多个数据库进行检索、参考文献筛选和专家咨询开展文献回顾。

结果

该逐步方法的核心是一个“计划-执行-检查-行动”循环,其中沟通、实施和评估是除方案开发外的关键阶段。此外,该模型还解释了每个阶段的决策和结果如何受到环境因素的影响。该模型强调将质量和质量衡量作为首先要开发的项目。只有在这些项目到位之后,才能解决激励措施的开发问题。

结论

该模型为以实际结构设计和实施绩效薪酬制方案提供了指导。根据未来的研究结果,MIMIQ 模型将作为最新的绩效薪酬制政策和实践工具不断发展。

相似文献

1
Pay-for-performance step-by-step: introduction to the MIMIQ model.按效付费步步走:MIMIQ 模型介绍。
Health Policy. 2011 Sep;102(1):8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.09.014. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
2
Building blocks to adopting a pay-for-performance model.采用绩效薪酬模式的基石。
JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul. 2008 Jul-Sep;10(3):64-9; quiz 70-1. doi: 10.1097/01.NHL.0000300794.20509.73.
3
An alternative to pay-for-performance: one health plan's approach to quality improvement.按绩效付费的替代方案:一家健康计划机构的质量改进方法。
J Healthc Qual. 2011 Jan-Feb;33(1):22-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2010.00100.x.
4
Pay for performance in Medicare: evidentiary irony and the politics of value.医疗保险中的按绩效付费:证据悖论与价值政治。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009 Oct;34(5):717-46. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2009-023.
5
The early experience of a hospital-based pay-for-performance program.一项基于医院的绩效薪酬计划的早期经验。
J Healthc Manag. 2007 Mar-Apr;52(2):95-107; discussion 107-8.
6
Medicaid nursing home pay for performance: where do we stand?医疗补助养老院绩效薪酬:我们目前的状况如何?
Gerontologist. 2009 Oct;49(5):587-95. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp044. Epub 2009 May 20.
7
[Public reporting of the Californian "pay for performance" conducted by the Integrated Healthcare Association (IHA)].[由综合医疗保健协会(IHA)对加利福尼亚州“按绩效付费”进行的公开报告]
Gesundheitswesen. 2007 Aug-Sep;69(8-9):438-47. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-985887.
8
Assessment of a pay-for-performance program in primary care designed by target users.目标用户设计的初级保健按绩效付费计划评估。
Fam Pract. 2013 Apr;30(2):161-71. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cms055. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
9
[Financial incentives for quality improvement].[质量改进的经济激励措施]
Lege Artis Med. 2010 May;20(5):331-8.
10
Pay-for-performance programs to reduce racial/ethnic disparities: what might different designs achieve?减少种族/民族差异的绩效薪酬计划:不同的设计可能会取得什么成果?
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 Feb;23(1):144-60. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0030.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization and effectiveness of pay-for-performance in ophthalmology: a systematic review.眼科绩效薪酬的特征与效果:一项系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 5;17(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2333-x.
2
Performing Economic Evaluation of Integrated Care: Highway to Hell or Stairway to Heaven?对综合医疗进行经济评估:通往地狱之路还是通往天堂的阶梯?
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Oct 19;16(4):3. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2472.
3
Who to pay for performance? The choice of organisational level for hospital performance incentives.为谁买单?医院绩效激励的组织层级选择。
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 May;17(4):435-42. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0690-0. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
4
Effects of performance measure implementation on clinical manager and provider motivation.绩效指标实施对临床管理人员和提供者积极性的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec;29 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):877-84. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3020-9.
5
Consequences of nursing procedures measurement on job satisfaction.护理程序测量对工作满意度的影响
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2013 Mar;18(2):123-7.
6
Design choices made by target users for a pay-for-performance program in primary care: an action research approach.目标用户在初级保健中为按绩效付费计划所做的设计选择:一种行动研究方法。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Mar 27;13:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-25.