Suppr超能文献

两种提取技术的比较研究,以获得有代表性的香气提取物,用于气相色谱-嗅觉分析:应用于烤开心果香气。

Comparative study of two extraction techniques to obtain representative aroma extracts for being analysed by gas chromatography-olfactometry: application to roasted pistachio aroma.

机构信息

Research Group of Analytical Chemistry of Wine and Food, Department of Analytical Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, Campus Sescelades, Faculty of Oenology of Tarragona, Rovira i Virgili University, 43007 Tarragona, Spain.

出版信息

J Chromatogr A. 2010 Dec 3;1217(49):7781-7. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.10.030. Epub 2010 Oct 13.

Abstract

This research paper presents a comparative study of two different extraction and concentration techniques to obtain representative pistachio aroma extracts: the traditional direct solvent extraction (DSE) followed by high-vacuum transfer (HVT) and the headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME). The results showed that, although both techniques provide accurate information about the aromatic composition that will be perceived by the consumer, the precision in terms of within-day repeatability and between-days repeatability (intermediate precision) of the chromatographic areas presented better values for HS-SPME than for DSE-HVT. Moreover the solvent-free HS-SPME allows the extraction of more odour-active regions, requires very little sample handling and shorter time for sampling.

摘要

本研究论文对两种不同的提取和浓缩技术进行了比较研究,以获得具有代表性的开心果香气提取物:传统的直接溶剂提取(DSE)后接着进行高真空转移(HVT)和顶空固相微萃取(HS-SPME)。结果表明,尽管这两种技术都能提供关于消费者将感知到的香气成分的准确信息,但在色谱峰面积的日内重复性和日间重复性(中间精密度)方面,HS-SPME 的精度值要好于 DSE-HVT。此外,无溶剂的 HS-SPME 可以提取更多的气味活性区域,需要很少的样品处理和更短的采样时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验