School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JN, Scotland, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2010 Dec 15;409(2):267-77. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.09.007. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
The Unified Bioaccessibility Method (UBM), which simulates the fluids of the human gastrointestinal tract, was used to assess the oral bioaccessibility of Cr in 27 Glasgow soils. These included several contaminated with Cr(VI), the most toxic form of Cr, from the past disposal of chromite ore processing residue (COPR). The extraction was employed in conjunction with the subsequent determination of the bioaccessible Cr by ICP-OES and Cr(VI) by the diphenylcarbazide complexation colorimetric procedure. In addition, Cr(III)-containing species were determined by (i) HPLC-ICP-MS and (ii) ICP-OES analysis of gel electrophoretically separated components of colloidal and dissolved fractions from centrifugal ultrafiltration of extracts. Similar analytical procedures were applied to the determination of Cr and its species in extracts of the <10 μm fraction of soils subjected to a simulated lung fluid test to assess the inhalation bioaccessibility of Cr. The oral bioaccessibility of Cr was typically greater by a factor of 1.5 in the 'stomach' (pH ~1.2) compared with the 'stomach+intestine' (pH ~6.3) simulation. On average, excluding two COPR-contaminated soil samples, the oral bioaccessibility ('stomach') was 5% of total soil Cr and, overall, similar to the soil Cr(VI) concentration. Chromium(VI) was not detected in the extracts, a consequence of pH- and soil organic matter-mediated reduction in the 'stomach' to Cr(III)-containing species, identified as predominantly Cr(III)-humic complexes. Insertion of oral bioaccessible fraction data into the SNIFFER human health risk assessment model identified site-specific assessment criteria (for residential land without plant uptake) that were exceeded by the soil total Cr (3680 mg kg(-1)) and Cr(VI) (1485 mg kg(-1)) concentration at only the most COPR-Cr(VI)-contaminated location. However, the presence of measurable Cr(VI) in the <10 μm fraction of the two most highly Cr(VI)-contaminated soils demonstrated that inhalation of Cr(VI)-containing dust remains the most potentially harmful exposure route.
采用模拟人体胃肠道液体的统一生物可给性方法(UBM),评估了 27 种格拉斯哥土壤中 Cr 的口服生物可给性。这些土壤包括过去铬铁矿加工残渣(COPR)处置过程中 Cr(VI)(Cr 的最具毒性形式)污染的几种土壤。采用该提取方法,并随后通过电感耦合等离子体 - 原子发射光谱法(ICP-OES)测定可提取的 Cr 和二苯卡巴肼络合比色法测定 Cr(VI)。此外,通过以下两种方法测定含 Cr(III)的物种:(i) 高效液相色谱 - 电感耦合等离子体质谱法(HPLC-ICP-MS)和 (ii) 离心超滤提取胶体和溶解部分的凝胶电泳分离成分的 ICP-OES 分析。对经模拟肺液测试的 <10 μm 土壤部分提取物中 Cr 及其形态的测定也采用了类似的分析程序,以评估 Cr 的吸入生物可给性。与“胃+肠”(pH6.3)模拟相比,“胃”(pH1.2)中 Cr 的口服生物可给性通常高 1.5 倍。平均而言,不包括两个 COPR 污染的土壤样本,口服生物可给性(“胃”)为土壤总 Cr 的 5%,且总体上与土壤 Cr(VI)浓度相似。Cr(VI)未在提取物中检出,这是由于 pH 和土壤有机质介导的“胃”中 Cr(VI)还原为含 Cr(III)的物种所致,这些物种被鉴定为主要为 Cr(III)-腐殖质络合物。将口服生物可给性分数数据插入 SNIFFER 人体健康风险评估模型中,确定了特定地点的评估标准(对于无植物吸收的居住用地),仅在 COPR-Cr(VI)污染最严重的地点,土壤总 Cr(3680 mg kg(-1))和 Cr(VI)(1485 mg kg(-1))浓度超过了这些标准。然而,在两个 Cr(VI)污染最严重的土壤的 <10 μm 部分中存在可测量的 Cr(VI)表明,吸入含 Cr(VI)的粉尘仍然是最具潜在危害的暴露途径。