University of Exeter, UK.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2005 Sep;22(6):643-59. doi: 10.1080/02643290442000220.
This study focuses on the pattern of impairments seen in a new case KT, diagnosed with nonfluent progressive aphasia (NFPA), a degenerative disorder of language production. A systematic examination of KT's performance on a wide range of language production tasks (i.e., repetition, reading, spelling, spoken and written naming) determined that both written naming and repetition were better preserved than reading, spelling-to-dictation, and spoken naming. Closer examination of error performance in both reading aloud and written production revealed evidence of "deep dyslexia" and "deep dysgraphia" that has not been documented in previous cases of NFPA, and as such the present case represents the first detailed case study of this pattern of impairment in the context of progressive aphasia. An evaluation and discussion of such deep language impairment disorders in the context of other cases of NFPA has been undertaken with reference to the summation hypothesis proposed by Hillis and Caramazza (1991, 1995). It is suggested that as a principle that holds across all language production tasks, this account can encompass patterns of deep disorders thus far reported in NFPA, although other theoretical hypotheses cannot be excluded.
本研究关注的是新病例 KT 所表现出的损伤模式,KT 被诊断为非流利性进展性失语症(NFPA),这是一种语言生成的退行性疾病。对 KT 在广泛的语言生成任务(即重复、阅读、拼写、口语和书面命名)上的表现进行系统检查后,发现书面命名和重复比阅读、拼写听写和口语命名保存得更好。对朗读和书面生成中的错误表现进行更仔细的检查,揭示了“深层失读症”和“深层失写症”的证据,这在以前的 NFPA 病例中没有记录到,因此,本病例代表了在进行性失语症背景下首次详细的此类损伤模式的病例研究。在对其他 NFPA 病例进行评估和讨论时,Hillis 和 Caramazza(1991、1995)提出的综合假说也被用于讨论这种深层语言损伤障碍。有人认为,作为适用于所有语言生成任务的一个原则,这一说法可以涵盖迄今为止在 NFPA 中报告的深层障碍模式,尽管不能排除其他理论假设。