Department of Behavioural Sciences and Philosophy, FIN-20014 University of Turku, Finland.
Bioethics. 2012 May;26(4):207-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01842.x. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
In contemporary Western biomedical ethics, informed consent practices are commonly justified in terms of the intrinsic value of patient autonomy. James Stacey Taylor maintains that this conception of the moral grounding of medical informed consent is mistaken. On the basis of his reasoning to that effect, Taylor argues that medical informed consent is justified by the instrumental value of personal autonomy. In this article, I examine whether Taylor's justification of medical informed consent is plausible.
在当代西方生物医学伦理学中,知情同意实践通常以患者自主性的内在价值为依据进行辩护。詹姆斯·斯泰西·泰勒(James Stacey Taylor)认为,这种对医疗知情同意的道德基础的理解是错误的。基于他的推理,泰勒认为,医疗知情同意是由个人自主性的工具价值来证明的。在本文中,我将考察泰勒对医疗知情同意的论证是否合理。