Ursin Lars Oystein
Philosophy Department and Bioethics Research Group, Norwegian University of Technology and Science, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Med Health Care Philos. 2009 Mar;12(1):17-24. doi: 10.1007/s11019-008-9144-0. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
Two ways of understanding the notion of autonomy are outlined and discussed in this article, in order to clarify how and if informed consent requirements in biotechnological research are to be justified by the promotion of personal autonomy: A proceduralist conception linking autonomy with authenticity, and a substantivist conception linking autonomy with control. The importance of distinguishing autonomy from liberty is emphasised, which opens for a possible conflict between respecting the freedom and the autonomy of research participants. It is argued that this has implications for how consent requirements based on different criteria of specificity and understanding should be viewed and justified.
本文概述并讨论了理解自主性概念的两种方式,以阐明生物技术研究中的知情同意要求如何以及是否能够通过促进个人自主性来得到正当性证明:一种是将自主性与本真性联系起来的程序主义概念,另一种是将自主性与控制权联系起来的实质主义概念。文中强调了区分自主性与自由的重要性,这揭示了在尊重研究参与者的自由和自主性之间可能存在的冲突。文章认为,这对基于不同特异性和理解标准的同意要求应如何看待和证明其正当性具有影响。