Suppr超能文献

严重烧伤患者血流感染的发病率和死亡率。

Morbidity and mortality of bloodstream infections in patients with severe burn injury.

机构信息

Burn Unit, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Am J Crit Care. 2010 Nov;19(6):e81-7. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2010341.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bloodstream infections are common in burn patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of bloodstream infections in patients with severe burn injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective, pairwise-matched, risk-adjusted cohort study in a 6-bed burn unit was done. "Exposed" patients with microbiological evidence of bloodstream infections (n = 76) were compared with nonexposed patients (n = 103) matched for burn severity (identical Belgian Outcome in Burn Injury score) and length of hospitalization (≥time-to-event in exposed patients). Main outcome measures were length of hospitalization and mortality.

RESULTS

Predominant pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus, enterococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, coagulase-negative staphylococci, and Candida species. Median patient age was 42 years (interquartile range [IQR], 31-52). Median total burned surface area was 40% (IQR, 25%-50%). Inhalation injury occurred in 54%. Median burn injury score was 4 (IQR, 2-5). Median length of stay before onset of bacteremia was 11 days (IQR, 5.3-19.8). Appropriate antimicrobial therapy was initiated within the first 48 hours in 76%. The exposed group had a higher need for vasopressive/inotropic support (P = .02); need for ventilatory assistance and renal replacement therapy did not differ significantly between groups. Hospital mortality did not differ (P = .30). However, bloodstream infection was associated with longer durations of hospitalization (P < .001) and mechanical ventilation (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of burn patients, bloodstream infections did not adversely affect survival, but greater durations of ventilator dependency and hospital stay increased costs of care.

摘要

背景

血流感染在烧伤患者中很常见。

目的

评估严重烧伤患者血流感染的影响。

方法

在一个 6 床烧伤单元进行了回顾性、配对、风险调整的队列研究。有微生物学证据表明患有血流感染(n=76)的“暴露”患者与烧伤严重程度(相同的比利时烧伤结局评分)和住院时间(暴露患者的时间至事件)相匹配的无暴露患者(n=103)进行比较。主要观察指标是住院时间和死亡率。

结果

主要病原体为金黄色葡萄球菌、肠球菌、铜绿假单胞菌、大肠杆菌、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌和念珠菌属。患者中位年龄为 42 岁(四分位距[IQR],31-52)。中位总烧伤面积为 40%(IQR,25%-50%)。吸入性损伤发生率为 54%。烧伤损伤评分中位数为 4(IQR,2-5)。菌血症发生前的中位住院时间为 11 天(IQR,5.3-19.8)。76%的患者在 48 小时内开始接受适当的抗菌治疗。暴露组需要血管加压/正性肌力支持的比例更高(P=.02);两组间需要呼吸机辅助和肾脏替代治疗的差异无统计学意义。两组间住院死亡率无差异(P=.30)。然而,血流感染与住院时间(P <.001)和机械通气时间(P <.001)延长相关。

结论

在本队列的烧伤患者中,血流感染并未对生存率产生不利影响,但呼吸机依赖和住院时间延长会增加医疗费用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验