Kuntsi Jonna, Wood Alexis C, Rijsdijk Frühling, Johnson Katherine A, Andreou Penelope, Albrecht Björn, Arias-Vasquez Alejandro, Buitelaar Jan K, McLoughlin Gráinne, Rommelse Nanda N J, Sergeant Joseph A, Sonuga-Barke Edmund J, Uebel Henrik, van der Meere Jaap J, Banaschewski Tobias, Gill Michael, Manor Iris, Miranda Ana, Mulas Fernando, Oades Robert D, Roeyers Herbert, Rothenberger Aribert, Steinhausen Hans-Christoph, Faraone Stephen V, Asherson Philip
MRC Social, Genetic, and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;67(11):1159-67. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.139.
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is associated with widespread cognitive impairments, but it is not known whether the apparent multiple impairments share etiological roots or separate etiological pathways exist. A better understanding of the etiological pathways is important for the development of targeted interventions and for identification of suitable intermediate phenotypes for molecular genetic investigations.
To determine, by using a multivariate familial factor analysis approach, whether 1 or more familial factors underlie the slow and variable reaction times, impaired response inhibition, and choice impulsivity associated with ADHD.
An ADHD and control sibling-pair design.
Belgium, Germany, Ireland, Israel, Spain, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.
A total of 1265 participants, aged 6 to 18 years: 464 probands with ADHD and 456 of their siblings (524 with combined-subtype ADHD), and 345 control participants.
Performance on a 4-choice reaction time task, a go/no-go inhibition task, and a choice-delay task.
The final model consisted of 2 familial factors. The larger factor, reflecting 85% of the familial variance of ADHD, captured 98% to 100% of the familial influences on mean reaction time and reaction time variability. The second, smaller factor, reflecting 13% of the familial variance of ADHD, captured 62% to 82% of the familial influences on commission and omission errors on the go/no-go task. Choice impulsivity was excluded in the final model because of poor fit.
The findings suggest the existence of 2 familial pathways to cognitive impairments in ADHD and indicate promising cognitive targets for future molecular genetic investigations. The familial distinction between the 2 cognitive impairments is consistent with recent theoretical models--a developmental model and an arousal-attention model--of 2 separable underlying processes in ADHD. Future research that tests the familial model within a developmental framework may inform developmentally sensitive interventions.
注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)与广泛的认知障碍相关,但尚不清楚这些明显的多种障碍是具有共同的病因根源还是存在不同的病因途径。更好地理解病因途径对于制定有针对性的干预措施以及确定适合分子遗传学研究的中间表型非常重要。
采用多变量家族因素分析方法,确定是否有1个或多个家族因素是与ADHD相关的反应时缓慢且多变、反应抑制受损和选择冲动的基础。
ADHD与对照同胞对设计。
比利时、德国、爱尔兰、以色列、西班牙、瑞士和英国。
共1265名6至18岁的参与者:464名患有ADHD的先证者及其456名同胞(524名患有混合型ADHD),以及345名对照参与者。
四选一反应时任务、停止信号抑制任务和选择延迟任务的表现。
最终模型由2个家族因素组成。较大的因素反映了ADHD家族变异的85%,捕捉到了家族对平均反应时和反应时变异性98%至100%的影响。第二个较小的因素反映了ADHD家族变异的13%,捕捉到了家族对停止信号任务中 commission和遗漏错误62%至82%的影响。由于拟合不佳,选择冲动被排除在最终模型之外。
研究结果表明ADHD中存在2条导致认知障碍的家族途径,并为未来的分子遗传学研究指明了有前景的认知靶点。这两种认知障碍之间的家族差异与ADHD中两个可分离的潜在过程的近期理论模型——发展模型和觉醒-注意模型——一致。未来在发展框架内测试家族模型的研究可能会为具有发展敏感性的干预措施提供信息。