London Regional Cancer Program, 790 Commissioners Rd E, London, Ontario, Canada N6A4L6.
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 10;28(35):5153-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.0731. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with high local control rates. The impact of introducing SBRT in patients 75 years of age or older was studied using a population-based cancer registry.
The Amsterdam Cancer Registry was assessed in three eras: 1999 to 2001 (period A, pre-SBRT); 2002 to 2004 (period B, some availability of SBRT), and 2005 to 2007 (period C, full access to SBRT). χ(2), Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression were used to compare treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) in three treatment groups: surgery, radiotherapy (RT), or neither.
A total of 875 elderly patients were diagnosed with stage I NSCLC in the study period. Median follow-up was 54 months. Primary treatment was surgery in 299 patients (34%), RT in 299 patients (34%), and neither in 277 patients (32%). RT use increased between periods A and C (26% v 42%, P < .01), corresponding to a decrease in untreated patients. The percentage of RT patients undergoing SBRT in periods B and C was 23% and 55%, respectively. Median survival for all patients increased from 16 months in period A to 21 months in period C (log-rank P < .01; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.80). The improvement in OS was confined to RT patients (HR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.99), whereas no significant survival improvements were seen in the other groups.
SBRT introduction was associated with a 16% absolute increase in RT use, a decline in the proportion of untreated elderly patients, and an improvement in OS.
立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)治疗 I 期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的局部控制率较高。本研究使用基于人群的癌症登记处,研究了在 75 岁或以上的患者中引入 SBRT 的影响。
评估阿姆斯特丹癌症登记处,分为三个时期:1999 年至 2001 年(时期 A,SBRT 前);2002 年至 2004 年(时期 B,SBRT 开始使用)和 2005 年至 2007 年(时期 C,全面使用 SBRT)。使用 χ²、Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 回归比较三组治疗方法(手术、放疗或两者都不)的治疗模式和总生存率(OS)。
研究期间,共有 875 例老年 I 期 NSCLC 患者被诊断。中位随访时间为 54 个月。主要治疗方法为手术 299 例(34%)、放疗 299 例(34%)、两者均未行治疗 277 例(32%)。A 期和 C 期放疗使用率分别为 26%和 42%(P<.01),相应的未治疗患者比例下降。B 期和 C 期的 SBRT 放疗患者比例分别为 23%和 55%。所有患者的中位生存时间从 A 期的 16 个月增加到 C 期的 21 个月(对数秩 P<.01;风险比[HR] = 0.65;95%CI,0.54 至 0.80)。OS 的改善仅见于放疗患者(HR = 0.70;95%CI,0.49 至 0.99),而其他组无明显生存获益。
SBRT 的引入与放疗使用率绝对增加 16%、未经治疗的老年患者比例下降以及 OS 改善相关。