Suppr超能文献

联合检测 AFP 和 TCH 在恶性与非结核性良性腹水鉴别诊断中的价值。

Value of combined detection of AFU and TCH in differential diagnosis between malignant and non-tuberculous benign ascites.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Med Oncol. 2011 Dec;28 Suppl 1:S670-4. doi: 10.1007/s12032-010-9731-9. Epub 2010 Nov 2.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to accurately evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of combined detection of ascitic fluid alpha-L-fucosidase (AFU) and cholesterol (TCH) compared with that of their individual detection. We assayed ascitic AFU activity by colorimetry and TCH level by CHOD-PAP method simultaneously in all 213 cases. Then, we assessed the value of combined detection of AFU and TCH activities with receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), including diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predict value(PV+), negative predict value(PV-) to see whether these two ascitic fluid biochemical examinations might help in differential diagnosis between malignant and non-tuberculous benign ascites. The mean values of AFU and TCH in malignant group [(164.96 ± 87.72) μmol/lh and (1.65 ± 1.00) mmol/l, respectively] were significantly higher than those in non-tuberculous benign group [(104.02 ± 62.08) μmol/lh and (0.69 ± 0.58) mmol/l, respectively] (P < 0.01). The optimal cutoff value of 101.95 μmol/lh for ascitic AFU and 1.04 mmol/l for ascitic TCH resulted in a diagnostic sensitivity of 82.3% and 70.8%, specificity of 63.2 and 83.8%, accuracy of 72.8 and 77.9%, PV+ of 65.3 and 78.2%, PV- of 83.1 and 77.8%, respectively. Combined detection of the two markers, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PV+ and PV- were 86.5, 85.5, 85.9, 83.0, and 88.5%, respectively. Through comparison by Pearson Chi-square, the combined detection of AFU and TCH produced better diagnostic accuracy (85.9%) compared with the individual detection (P < 0.05). The combined detection of AFU and TCH produced better diagnostic accuracy in comparison with their individual detection, which is helpful to differential diagnosis between malignant and non-tuberculous benign ascites that may be relatively ideal markers to fit for clinical application in local hospitals.

摘要

本研究旨在准确评估联合检测腹水 α-L-岩藻糖苷酶(AFU)和胆固醇(TCH)与单独检测相比的诊断效能。我们通过比色法同时检测所有 213 例患者的腹水 AFU 活性,通过 CHOD-PAP 法检测 TCH 水平。然后,我们通过接收者操作特征曲线(ROC 曲线)评估 AFU 和 TCH 联合检测的价值,包括诊断灵敏度、特异性、诊断准确性、阳性预测值(PV+)、阴性预测值(PV-),以观察这两种腹水生化检查是否有助于恶性和非结核性良性腹水的鉴别诊断。恶性组的 AFU 和 TCH 平均值[(164.96±87.72)μmol/lh 和(1.65±1.00)mmol/l]明显高于非结核性良性组[(104.02±62.08)μmol/lh 和(0.69±0.58)mmol/l](P<0.01)。腹水 AFU 的最佳截断值为 101.95 μmol/lh,腹水 TCH 的最佳截断值为 1.04 mmol/l,诊断灵敏度分别为 82.3%和 70.8%,特异性分别为 63.2%和 83.8%,准确性分别为 72.8%和 77.9%,阳性预测值分别为 65.3%和 78.2%,阴性预测值分别为 83.1%和 77.8%。联合检测两种标志物的灵敏度、特异性、准确性、PV+和 PV-分别为 86.5%、85.5%、85.9%、83.0%和 88.5%。通过 Pearson Chi-square 比较,AFU 和 TCH 的联合检测比单独检测具有更高的诊断准确性(85.9%)(P<0.05)。与单独检测相比,AFU 和 TCH 的联合检测具有更高的诊断准确性,有助于恶性和非结核性良性腹水的鉴别诊断,可能是相对理想的适合当地医院临床应用的标志物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验