Suppr超能文献

关于临床学习中不安全护生的观点。

Views on unsafe nursing students in clinical learning.

作者信息

Killam Laura A, Montgomery Phyllis, Luhanga Florence Loyce, Adamic Peter, Carter Lorraine M

机构信息

Laurentian University.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2010;7:Article36. doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.2026. Epub 2010 Oct 13.

Abstract

Clinical education is a cornerstone of undergraduate nursing education programs. Although protecting patient safety in clinical learning experiences is a standard of practice, no standard definition of the "unsafe" student exists. The purpose of this study was to describe the viewpoints of undergraduate student nurses and their clinical educators about unsafe clinical student practices. Using Q methodology, 57 students and 14 clinical educators sorted 39 unsafe student practice statements. These statements were generated from an integrated review of nursing and related literature and two undergraduate student focus groups. The use of centroid factor analysis with varimax rotation produced three dimensions of unsafe student practices. An unsafe student was characterized by his/her Compromised Professional Accountability, Incomplete Praxis, and Clinical Disengagement. A shared attribute among these three features was violated professional integrity. While students' affective, cognitive, and praxis competencies were priority elements in the conceptualization of unsafe student practice, this study also identified the salient role of educators as active participants in preparation of safe practitioners.

摘要

临床教育是本科护理教育项目的基石。尽管在临床学习经历中保护患者安全是一种实践标准,但对于“不安全”学生并没有标准定义。本研究的目的是描述本科护生及其临床教育工作者对不安全临床学生行为的看法。采用Q方法,57名学生和14名临床教育工作者对39条不安全学生行为陈述进行了分类。这些陈述来自对护理及相关文献的综合综述以及两个本科学生焦点小组。使用具有方差最大化旋转的质心因子分析得出了不安全学生行为的三个维度。不安全学生的特征是其职业责任感受损、实践不完整以及临床参与度低。这三个特征的一个共同属性是职业操守受到侵犯。虽然学生的情感、认知和实践能力是不安全学生行为概念化中的优先要素,但本研究也确定了教育工作者作为安全从业者培养的积极参与者的显著作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验