Olivas-Ávila José A, Musi-Lechuga Bertha
Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez (Mexico), Ciudad Juarez, Mexico.
Psicothema. 2010 Nov;22(4):917-23.
The purpose of the present study is to analyze the scientific production of the more productive Psychology faculty member of Spain through advised doctoral theses in the data base TESEO. The sample consisted of the 100 more productive professors of each one of the areas of Spanish Psychology. We reviewed a total of 4036 records of which 2339 belong to the 610 professors who conformed the sample. The results reveal that the percentage of professors who have not directed any thesis accounts for 24%. On the other hand, the proportion of thesis by professor by areas oscillates in a range of between 5.25 and 2.50, being Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment the highest of this rank and Behavioral Sciences Methodology the last. In the last 7 years, the most productive professors have duplicated their theses direction. Finally, there is a rising trend in terms of theses read in every area, reaching the greater frequency in the years of 2003 and 2005. We discuss the considerations that represent the doctoral thesis direction for professors as criterion in their evaluation.
本研究的目的是通过数据库TESEO中指导的博士论文，分析西班牙心理学领域产出最高的教师的科研成果。样本包括西班牙心理学各领域中产出最高的100位教授。我们总共审查了4036条记录，其中2339条属于构成样本的610位教授。结果显示，没有指导过任何论文的教授比例为24%。另一方面，各领域教授指导的论文比例在5.25至2.50之间波动，其中人格、评估和心理治疗领域最高，行为科学方法论领域最低。在过去7年中，产出最高的教授指导的论文数量翻了一番。最后，各领域阅读的论文数量呈上升趋势，在2003年和2005年达到最高频率。我们讨论了博士论文指导对教授评估标准的影响因素。
