Musi-Lechuga Bertha, Olivas-Ávila José, Castro Angel
Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Psicothema. 2011 Aug;23(3):343-8.
The main objective of the present study was to classify doctoral programs with Quality Mention in Psychology based on their scientific productivity. For this purpose, articles in the Web of Science published by professors teaching in these doctoral programs were analyzed. In addition, we analyzed scientific journals in which these professors tend to publish more papers and the evolution in the number of papers published until 2009. Results showed that the most productive doctoral program was the Neurosciences program at the University of Oviedo. This program showed a ratio of 40 articles--published in journals included in Journal Citation Reports--by each professor. In contrast, other programs did not reach a ratio of 10 articles per professor. Regarding journals, results showed that 9 out of the 20 most popular journals are Hispanic and a gradual increase in the number of published papers was also observed. Lastly, results and implications for quality assessment are discussed.
本研究的主要目的是根据其科研生产力对心理学领域获得质量认可的博士项目进行分类。为此，对这些博士项目的授课教授在《科学引文索引》上发表的文章进行了分析。此外，我们还分析了这些教授倾向于发表更多论文的科学期刊以及截至2009年发表论文数量的变化情况。结果表明，最具生产力的博士项目是奥维耶多大学的神经科学项目。该项目每位教授在《期刊引证报告》收录的期刊上发表的文章比例为40篇。相比之下，其他项目每位教授发表的文章比例未达到10篇。关于期刊，结果显示，20种最受欢迎的期刊中有9种是西班牙语期刊，并且发表论文的数量也呈逐渐增加的趋势。最后，讨论了研究结果及其对质量评估的启示。
