Suppr超能文献

社区康复对创伤性脑损伤患者的疗效:489 例完成康复治疗患者与提前出院患者比较。

Effectiveness of community-based rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury for 489 program completers compared with those precipitously discharged.

机构信息

Gentiva Rehab Without Walls, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;91(11):1697-704. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.001.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes of home- and community-based postacute brain injury rehabilitation (PABIR).

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of program evaluation data for treatment completers and noncompleters.

SETTING

Home- and community-based PABIR conducted in 7 geographically distinct U.S. cities.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (N=489) with traumatic brain injury who completed the prescribed course of rehabilitation (completed-course-of-treatment [CCT] group) compared with 114 who were discharged precipitously before program completion (precipitous-discharge [PD] group).

INTERVENTION

PABIR delivered in home and community settings by certified professional staff on an individualized basis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4) completed by means of professional consensus on admission and at discharge; MPAI-4 Participation Index at 3- and 12-month follow-up through telephone contact.

RESULTS

Analysis of covariance (CCT vs PD group as between-subjects variable, admission MPAI-4 score as covariate) showed significant differences between groups at discharge on the full MPAI-4 (F=82.25; P<.001), Ability Index (F=50.24; P<.001), Adjustment Index (F=81.20; P<.001), and Participation Index (F=59.48; P<.001). A large portion of the sample was lost to follow-up; however, available data showed that group differences remained statistically significant at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Results provided evidence of the effectiveness of home- and community-based PABIR and that treatment effects were maintained at follow-up.

摘要

目的

评估家庭和社区为基础的脑损伤后康复(PABIR)的结果。

设计

对治疗完成者和未完成者的方案评估数据进行回顾性分析。

设置

在美国 7 个地理位置不同的城市进行家庭和社区为基础的 PABIR。

参与者

完成规定康复疗程的创伤性脑损伤患者(完成疗程治疗[CCT]组)与 114 名在疗程完成前仓促出院的患者(仓促出院[PD]组)比较。

干预措施

由认证专业人员在家庭和社区环境中根据个人情况提供 PABIR。

主要观察指标

通过专业共识在入院和出院时使用 Mayo-Portland 适应性量表(MPAI-4);通过电话联系在 3 个月和 12 个月的随访时使用 MPAI-4 参与指数。

结果

协方差分析(CCT 与 PD 组为组间变量,入院 MPAI-4 评分作为协变量)显示,出院时两组在 MPAI-4 总分(F=82.25;P<.001)、能力指数(F=50.24;P<.001)、调整指数(F=81.20;P<.001)和参与指数(F=59.48;P<.001)上均有显著差异。样本中有很大一部分人失访;然而,可获得的数据表明,在随访时组间差异仍具有统计学意义。

结论

结果提供了家庭和社区为基础的 PABIR 的有效性的证据,并且治疗效果在随访时仍保持。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验