Faculty of Physics, University of Belgrade, PO Box 368, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
J Hazard Mater. 2011 Jan 30;185(2-3):1280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.043. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) was investigated for the simultaneous removal of NO(x) and SO(2) from flue gas in a coal-combustion power plant. The DBD equipment was used in either a mode where flue gas was directed through the discharge zone (direct oxidation), or a mode where produced ozonized air was injected in the flue gas stream (indirect oxidation). Removal efficiencies of SO(2) and NO for both methods were measured and compared. Oxidation of NO is more efficient in the indirect oxidation, while oxidation of SO(2) is more efficient in the direct oxidation. Addition of NH(3), has lead to efficient removal of SO(2), due to thermal reaction, and has also enhanced NO removal due to heterogeneous reactions on the surface of ammonium salt aerosols. In the direct oxidation, concentration of CO increased significantly, while it maintained its level in the indirect oxidation.
介质阻挡放电(DBD)被用于从燃煤电厂的烟道气中同时去除 NO(x) 和 SO(2)。DBD 设备的使用方式有两种,一种是将烟道气直接导向放电区(直接氧化),另一种是将产生的臭氧空气注入烟道气流(间接氧化)。测量并比较了这两种方法对 SO(2) 和 NO 的去除效率。间接氧化中 NO 的氧化效率更高,而直接氧化中 SO(2)的氧化效率更高。添加 NH(3),由于热反应,导致 SO(2)的去除效率很高,并且由于在铵盐气溶胶表面的多相反应,也增强了 NO 的去除。在直接氧化中,CO 的浓度显著增加,而在间接氧化中其浓度保持不变。