Institute of Automation, University of Bremen, Otto-Hahn-Allee 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
J Neural Eng. 2010 Dec;7(6):066007. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/7/6/066007. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
Current brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) that make use of EEG acquisition techniques require unpleasant electrode gel causing skin abrasion during the standard preparation procedure. Electrodes that require tap water instead of electrolytic electrode gel would make both daily setup and clean up much faster, easier and comfortable. This paper presents the results from ten subjects that controlled an SSVEP-based BCI speller system using two EEG sensor modalities: water-based and gel-based surface electrodes. Subjects performed in copy spelling mode using conventional gel-based electrodes and water-based electrodes with a mean information transfer rate (ITR) of 29.68 ± 14.088 bit min(-1) and of 26.56 ± 9.224 bit min(-1), respectively. A paired t-test failed to reveal significant differences in the information transfer rates and accuracies of using gel- or water-based electrodes for EEG acquisition. This promising result confirms the operational readiness of water-based electrodes for BCI applications.
当前使用 EEG 采集技术的脑-机接口 (BCI) 需要使用不舒适的电极凝胶,在标准准备过程中会导致皮肤磨损。使用不需要电解电极凝胶的电极可以使日常设置和清理变得更快、更容易和更舒适。本文介绍了十位受试者的实验结果,他们使用两种 EEG 传感器模式:基于水的和基于凝胶的表面电极来控制基于 SSVEP 的 BCI 拼写器系统。受试者使用传统的基于凝胶的电极和基于水的电极以复制拼写模式进行操作,平均信息传输率 (ITR) 分别为 29.68 ± 14.088 bit min(-1) 和 26.56 ± 9.224 bit min(-1)。配对 t 检验未能揭示使用基于凝胶或水的电极进行 EEG 采集时信息传输率和准确性的显著差异。这一有希望的结果证实了水基电极在 BCI 应用中的可操作性。