McCormack Brendan, Karlsson Bengt, Dewing Jan, Lerdal Anners
Person Centred Practice Research Centre, Institute of Nursing Research/School of Nursing, University of Ulster, Co Antrim, UK.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2010 Sep;24(3):620-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2010.00814.x.
Person-centredness as a concept is becoming more prominent and increasingly central within some research literature, approaches to practice and as a guiding principle within some health and social care policy. Despite the increasing body of literature into person-centred nursing (PCN), there continues to be a 'siloed' approach to its study, with few studies integrating perspectives from across nursing specialties. The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a study undertaken to explore if the secondary analysis of findings from four different and unrelated research studies (that did not have the main aim of researching person-centredness) could inform our understanding of person-centred nursing. A qualitative meta-synthesis was undertaken of the data derived from the four unrelated research studies undertaken with different client groups with long-term health conditions. A hermeneutic and interpretative approach was used to guide the analysis of data and framed within a particular person-centred nursing framework. Findings suggest 'professional competence' (where competence is understood more broadly than technical competence) and knowing 'self' are important prerequisites for person-centred nursing. Characteristics of the care environment were also found to be critical. Despite the existence of expressed person-centred values, care processes largely remained routinised, ritualistic and affording few opportunities for the formation of meaningful relationships. Person-centred nursing needs to be understood in a broader context than the immediate nurse-patient/family relationship. The person-centred nursing framework has utility in helping to understand the dynamics of the components of person-centredness and overcoming the siloed nature of many current perspectives.
以人为本作为一个概念,在一些研究文献、实践方法以及某些健康和社会护理政策的指导原则中,正变得越来越突出且日益核心。尽管关于以人为本护理(PCN)的文献越来越多,但对其研究仍采用“孤立”的方法,很少有研究整合各护理专业的观点。本文的目的是呈现一项研究的结果,该研究旨在探讨对四项不同且不相关的研究(这些研究的主要目的并非研究以人为本)的结果进行二次分析,是否能增进我们对以人为本护理的理解。对来自四项针对不同长期健康状况客户群体的不相关研究的数据进行了定性元综合分析。采用诠释和解释方法来指导数据分析,并将其置于特定的以人为本护理框架内。研究结果表明,“专业能力”(这里的能力比技术能力的理解更广泛)和了解“自我”是以人为本护理的重要前提。护理环境的特征也被发现至关重要。尽管存在明确的以人为本价值观,但护理过程在很大程度上仍保持常规化、仪式化,几乎没有机会形成有意义的关系。以人为本护理需要在比直接的护患/家庭关系更广泛的背景下理解。以人为本护理框架有助于理解以人为本各组成部分的动态关系,并克服当前许多观点的孤立性。