University of Washington, School of Aquatic & Fishery Sciences, Box 355820, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Mol Ecol. 2010 Nov;19(22):4831-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04823.x.
Given over 90 combined years in academic and professional activities related to genetics and fishery management (FU 57, JS 36-see Waples et al. 2008), we are pleased to provide an invited perspective generated by the interesting and useful article of McCusker & Bentzen (2010). These authors reaffirm the apparent signature of neutrality of mitochondrial and microsatellite markers through an exhaustive analysis of archived genotypic data for 105 marine and freshwater fishes. They note that their conclusions are consistent with earlier and less comprehensive analyses and that they do not exclude the operation of some selective activity (e.g. genetic 'draft'), which may be overwhelmed by N(e) -related stochastic processes. Here, we provide a complementary focus, recalling relevant issues related to neutrality and selection in applications of molecular variations in fishery management.
在与遗传学和渔业管理相关的学术和专业活动中，我们拥有超过 90 年的综合经验（FU57，JS36-见 Waples 等人，2008 年），很高兴能够提供由 McCusker 和 Bentzen（2010 年）的这篇有趣且有用的文章生成的特邀观点。这些作者通过对 105 种海洋和淡水鱼类的存档基因型数据进行详尽分析，再次确认了线粒体和微卫星标记的中性的明显特征。他们指出，他们的结论与早期和不那么全面的分析一致，而且他们并不排除一些选择性活动（例如遗传“Draft”）的运作，这种活动可能被与 N(e)相关的随机过程所淹没。在这里，我们提供一个互补的重点，回顾与渔业管理中分子变异应用相关的中性和选择的相关问题。
