Department of Health Management and Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Crit Care. 2010;14(6):R199. doi: 10.1186/cc9319. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
There are inconsistent data about the effectiveness of prehospital physician-staffed advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) on the outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Furthermore, the relative importance of bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) and ACLS and the effectiveness of their combination have not been clearly demonstrated.
Using a prospective, nationwide, population-based registry of all OHCA patients in Japan, we enrolled 95,072 patients whose arrests were witnessed by bystanders and 23,127 patients witnessed by emergency medical service providers between 2005 and 2007. We divided the bystander-witnessed arrest patients into Group A (ACLS by emergency life-saving technicians without BCPR), Group B (ACLS by emergency life-saving technicians with BCPR), Group C (ACLS by physicians without BCPR) and Group D (ACLS by physicians with BCPR). The outcome data included 1-month survival and neurological outcomes determined by the cerebral performance category.
Among the 95,072 bystander-witnessed arrest patients, 7,722 (8.1%) were alive at 1 month, including 2,754 (2.9%) with good performance and 3,171 (3.3%) with vegetative status or worse. BCPR occurred in 42% of bystander-witnessed arrests. In comparison with Group A, the rates of good-performance survival were significantly higher in Group B (odds ratio (OR), 2.23; 95% confidence interval, 2.05 to 2.42; P < 0.01) and Group D (OR, 2.80; 95% confidence interval, 2.28 to 3.43; P < 0.01), while no significant difference was seen for Group C (OR, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.61; P = 0.32). The occurrence of vegetative status or worse at 1 month was highest in Group C (OR, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.55 to 2.37; P < 0.01).
In this registry-based study, BCPR significantly improved the survival of OHCA with good cerebral outcome. The groups with BCPR and ACLS by physicians had the best outcomes. However, receiving ACLS by physicians without preceding BCPR significantly increased the number of patients with neurologically unfavorable outcomes.
关于院前配备医师的高级心脏生命支持(ACLS)对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)结局的有效性存在不一致的数据。此外,旁观者启动心肺复苏术(BCPR)和 ACLS 的相对重要性及其联合应用的效果尚未明确。
我们使用了 2005 年至 2007 年日本所有 OHCA 患者的前瞻性、全国性、基于人群的登记处,纳入了 95072 名旁观者见证的和 23127 名由急救医疗服务提供者见证的 OHCA 患者。我们将旁观者见证的骤停患者分为 A 组(无 BCPR 的急救救生技术员进行 ACLS)、B 组(有 BCPR 的急救救生技术员进行 ACLS)、C 组(无 BCPR 的医师进行 ACLS)和 D 组(有 BCPR 的医师进行 ACLS)。结局数据包括 1 个月时的生存率和通过脑功能分类确定的神经功能结局。
在 95072 名旁观者见证的骤停患者中,7722 名(8.1%)在 1 个月时存活,其中 2754 名(2.9%)表现良好,3171 名(3.3%)处于植物人状态或更差。旁观者见证的骤停中有 42%发生了 BCPR。与 A 组相比,B 组(比值比(OR),2.23;95%置信区间,2.05 至 2.42;P<0.01)和 D 组(OR,2.80;95%置信区间,2.28 至 3.43;P<0.01)的良好表现生存率显著更高,而 C 组(OR,1.18;95%置信区间,0.86 至 1.61;P=0.32)则无显著差异。C 组(OR,1.92;95%置信区间,1.55 至 2.37;P<0.01)1 个月时出现植物人状态或更差的发生率最高。
在本基于登记处的研究中,BCPR 显著提高了 OHCA 患者的生存并获得良好的脑功能结局。有 BCPR 和医师 ACLS 的组具有最佳结局。然而,在没有先行 BCPR 的情况下接受医师 ACLS 会显著增加神经功能不良结局的患者数量。