• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对小重叠正面碰撞的重新审视。

A reexamination of the small overlap frontal crash.

作者信息

Scullion Paul, Morgan Richard M, Mohan Pradeep, Kan Cing-Dao, Shanks Kurt, Jin Wook, Tangirala Ravi

机构信息

George Washington University Hyundai-Kia Motors.

出版信息

Ann Adv Automot Med. 2010;54:137-48.

PMID:21050598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3242554/
Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine and rank the Small Overlap Frontal Crash as one of the eight-group taxonomy proposed by Ford. The Ford taxonomy classifies real-world frontal-impact crashes based on the National Automotive Sampling System (NASS). Frontally-impacted vehicles were identified for 1985 - 2008 model year passenger vehicles with Collision Deformation Classification (CDC) data from the 1995 - 2008 years of NASS. Small overlap frontal cases were identified where there was no engagement of the vehicle frame rails, and the direct damage was located entirely outside of the vehicle frame rails. The results are that full engagement and offset (offset category means the direct damage overlaps the vehicle frame rail, with the center of direct damage between the frame rails) were the most frequent crashes contributing 35% each. The frequency of the small overlap frontal was 6%. The risks of injury (AIS ≥ 2) for the full engagement, offset, and small overlap were 8%, 6%, and 3% respectively. For this study, the number of small overlap vehicles was 1,118 and the number of injured nearside occupants was 100. This study-following the Ford approach and reasonably identifying the location of the longitudinal rails based on CDC-suggests that the small overlap is at worst a moderately dangerous crash in the overall scheme of frontal crashes. The implications of this study are that the safety community should reexamine the significance of the small overlap frontal crash against an overall taxonomy of crashes.

摘要

本研究的目的是将小重叠正面碰撞作为福特提出的八类分类法之一进行检验和排名。福特分类法根据国家汽车抽样系统(NASS)对现实世界中的正面碰撞事故进行分类。利用1995 - 2008年NASS的碰撞变形分类(CDC)数据,识别出1985 - 2008年款乘用车中发生正面碰撞的车辆。确定了小重叠正面碰撞的案例,即车辆车架纵梁未参与碰撞,且直接损坏完全位于车架纵梁之外。结果显示,完全碰撞和偏置碰撞(偏置类别是指直接损坏与车架纵梁重叠,直接损坏中心位于纵梁之间)是最常见的碰撞类型,各占35%。小重叠正面碰撞的发生率为6%。完全碰撞、偏置碰撞和小重叠碰撞导致受伤(AIS≥2)的风险分别为8%、6%和3%。在本研究中,小重叠碰撞车辆数量为1118辆,近侧受伤乘客数量为100人。本研究遵循福特的方法,并根据CDC合理确定纵梁位置,表明在正面碰撞的整体情况中,小重叠碰撞充其量是一种中度危险的碰撞。本研究的意义在于,安全界应根据碰撞事故的整体分类法重新审视小重叠正面碰撞的重要性。

相似文献

1
A reexamination of the small overlap frontal crash.对小重叠正面碰撞的重新审视。
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2010;54:137-48.
2
Real-world injury patterns associated with Hybrid III sternal deflections in frontal crash tests.真实世界中与 Hybrid III 胸骨挠度相关的正面碰撞试验中的损伤模式。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(8):807-15. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.766825.
3
Injury mechanisms and severity in narrow offset frontal impacts.窄偏移量正面碰撞中的损伤机制与严重程度。
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2008 Oct;52:185-9.
4
Factors contributing to serious and fatal injuries in belted rear seat occupants in frontal crashes.导致正面碰撞中安全带后排座椅乘客重伤和死亡的因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup1):S84-S91. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1601182.
5
Opportunities for injury reduction in US frontal crashes: an overview by structural engagement, vehicle class, and occupant age.
Stapp Car Crash J. 2013 Nov;57:441-67. doi: 10.4271/2013-22-0017.
6
Association Between NCAP Ratings and Real-World Rear Seat Occupant Risk of Injury.新车评估计划(NCAP)评级与现实世界中后排乘客受伤风险之间的关联
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S146-52. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1061664.
7
Development of a frontal small overlap crashworthiness evaluation test.发展一种正面小重叠碰撞安全性评估测试。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14 Suppl:S128-35. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.790539.
8
Impact and injury patterns in between-rails frontal crashes of vehicles with good ratings for frontal crash protection.正面碰撞保护评级良好的车辆在双轨间正面碰撞中的碰撞及损伤模式
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012;56:255-65.
9
Rollover injury in vehicles with high-strength-to-weight ratio (SWR) roofs, curtain and side airbags, and other safety improvements.在配备高强度重量比(SWR)车顶、窗帘式和侧面安全气囊以及其他安全改进措施的车辆中的翻滚损伤。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(7):734-740. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1482489. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
10
Evaluation of Vehicle-Based Crash Severity Metrics.基于车辆的碰撞严重程度指标评估。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S132-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1067693.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact and injury patterns in between-rails frontal crashes of vehicles with good ratings for frontal crash protection.正面碰撞保护评级良好的车辆在双轨间正面碰撞中的碰撞及损伤模式
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012;56:255-65.

本文引用的文献

1
Injury mechanisms and severity in narrow offset frontal impacts.窄偏移量正面碰撞中的损伤机制与严重程度。
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2008 Oct;52:185-9.
2
The accuracy of WinSmash delta-V estimates: the influence of vehicle type, stiffness, and impact mode.WinSmash速度增量估计的准确性:车辆类型、刚度和碰撞模式的影响。
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2006;50:73-89.