• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高龄患者行血管内动脉瘤修复术安全有效。

Endovascular aneurysm repair in nonagenarians is safe and effective.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, The DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami Jackson Memorial Medical Center, Miami, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov;52(5):1140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.076.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.076
PMID:21050985
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Advanced age is a significant risk factor that has traditionally steered patients away from open aneurysm repair and toward expectant management. Today, however, the reduced morbidity and mortality of aortic stent grafting has created a new opportunity for aneurysm repair in patients previously considered too high a risk for open surgery. Here we report our experience with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in nonagenarians.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review identified all patients>90-years-old undergoing EVAR over a 9-year period at our institution. Collected data included preoperative comorbidities, perioperative complications, endoleaks, reinterventions, and long-term survival.

RESULTS

24 patients underwent EVAR. The mean age was 91.5 years (range 90-94) among 15 (63%) males and 9 (37%) females. Mean abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter was 6.3±1.1 cm. Eight patients (33%) were symptomatic (pain or tenderness). There were no ruptures. Fourteen patients (58%) had general anesthesia while 10 (42%) had local or regional anesthesia. Mean postoperative length of stay was 3.2±2.4 days (2.8±1.9 days for asymptomatic vs 4.1±3.2 days for symptomatic, P=.29). There was one perioperative mortality (4.2%). There were two local groin seromas (8.3%) and six systemic complications (25%). One patient required reintervention for endoleak (4.2%). There were no aneurysm related deaths beyond the 30-day postoperative period. Mean survival beyond 30 days was 29.7±18.0 months for patients expiring during follow-up. Cumulative estimated 12, 24, and 36-month survival rates were 83%, 64%, and 50%, respectively. Linear regression analysis demonstrated an inverse relationship between the number of preoperative comorbidities and postoperative survival in our cohort (R2=0.701), with significantly decreased survival noted for patients presenting with >5 comorbidities. Those still alive in follow-up have a mean survival of 36.1±16.0 months.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest reported EVAR series in nonagenarians. Despite their advanced age, these patients benefit from EVAR with low morbidity, low mortality, and mean survival exceeding 2.4 years. Survival appears best in those patients with ≤5 comorbidities. With or without symptoms, patients over the age of 90 should be considered for EVAR.

摘要

目的

高龄是一个重要的风险因素,传统上使患者远离开放型动脉瘤修复,转而采取期待治疗。然而,今天主动脉支架移植术的发病率和死亡率降低,为以前被认为开放手术风险过高的患者提供了新的动脉瘤修复机会。在此,我们报告了我们在 90 岁以上患者中进行血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)的经验。

方法

回顾性图表审查确定了 9 年来我院所有接受 EVAR 治疗的>90 岁患者。收集的数据包括术前合并症、围手术期并发症、内漏、再次干预和长期生存。

结果

24 例患者接受了 EVAR。15 例(63%)男性和 9 例(37%)女性的平均年龄为 91.5 岁(范围 90-94 岁)。平均腹主动脉瘤直径为 6.3±1.1cm。8 例(33%)患者有症状(疼痛或压痛)。没有破裂。14 例(58%)患者接受全身麻醉,10 例(42%)患者接受局部或区域麻醉。平均术后住院时间为 3.2±2.4 天(无症状者为 2.8±1.9 天,有症状者为 4.1±3.2 天,P=.29)。有 1 例围手术期死亡(4.2%)。有 2 例局部腹股沟血清肿(8.3%)和 6 例全身并发症(25%)。1 例患者因内漏需要再次干预(4.2%)。在术后 30 天内没有与动脉瘤相关的死亡。在随访期间死亡的患者,术后 30 天以上的平均生存率为 29.7±18.0 个月。累计估计 12、24 和 36 个月的生存率分别为 83%、64%和 50%。线性回归分析显示,我们队列中术前合并症数量与术后生存呈反比关系(R2=0.701),有>5 种合并症的患者生存率显著降低。在随访中仍存活的患者的平均生存时间为 36.1±16.0 个月。

结论

这是报道的最大的 90 岁以上患者 EVAR 系列。尽管他们年龄较大,但这些患者受益于 EVAR,发病率低,死亡率低,平均生存时间超过 2.4 年。在合并症≤5 种的患者中生存情况最好。有症状或无症状的 90 岁以上患者均应考虑进行 EVAR。

相似文献

1
Endovascular aneurysm repair in nonagenarians is safe and effective.高龄患者行血管内动脉瘤修复术安全有效。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov;52(5):1140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.076.
2
Acceptable risk but small benefit of endovascular aneurysm repair in nonagenarians.血管内动脉瘤修复术对九旬老人而言,风险可接受但获益微小。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 May;24(4):441-6. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.10.009. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
3
Outcome of elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in nonagenarians.非高龄患者择期血管内腹主动脉瘤修复的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug;54(2):287-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.12.046. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
4
Outcome of elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians and nonagenarians.择期血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术在 80 岁及以上和 90 岁及以上患者中的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Jun;51(6):1354-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.030. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
5
Elective EVAR in nonagenarians is safe in carefully selected patients.在经过精心挑选的患者中,对九旬老人进行选择性腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术是安全的。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Aug;28(6):1402-8. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.03.026. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
6
Endovascular repair of ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with lower 30-day mortality and better 5-year survival rates than open surgical repair.血管内修复破裂的肾下腹部主动脉瘤与开放手术修复相比,30 天死亡率较低,5 年生存率更高。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):368-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
7
Durability and survival are similar after elective endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in younger patients.在年轻患者中,腹主动脉瘤择期血管内修复术和开放修复术后的耐久性和生存率相似。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Mar;61(3):636-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
8
Evaluation of the Endurant stent graft under instructions for use vs off-label conditions for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.在血管内主动脉瘤修复的使用说明与超说明书条件下对 Endurant 支架移植物的评估。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug;54(2):300-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.12.062. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
9
Experience and outcomes after a decade of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a retrospective study from a community-based single center.血管内腹主动脉瘤修复十年后的经验与结果:一项基于社区的单中心回顾性研究
Ann Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;26(3):330-7. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2011.06.012. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
10
Graft infection after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术后移植物感染。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jul;54(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.11.111. Epub 2011 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
A 103 Year Old Man With a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.一名患有腹主动脉瘤破裂的103岁男性。
EJVES Vasc Forum. 2020 Feb 27;47:9-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2020.02.006. eCollection 2020.
2
Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a centenarian.百岁老人的腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2020 May 28;6(3):361-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2020.05.009. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Early cardiac rehabilitation: could it improve functional outcomes and reduce length of stay and sanitary costs in patients aged 75 years or older? A retrospective case-control study.
早期心脏康复:它能改善 75 岁或以上患者的功能预后并降低住院时间和卫生费用吗?一项回顾性病例对照研究。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Apr;33(4):957-964. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01589-x. Epub 2020 May 15.
4
Endovascular aneurysm repair in a centenarian: case report and systematic literature review.百岁老人的血管内动脉瘤修复术:病例报告与系统文献综述
J Surg Case Rep. 2020 Apr 3;2020(4):rjaa025. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjaa025. eCollection 2020 Apr.
5
Is Conventional Open Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Feasible in Nonagenarians?传统开放性修复术用于治疗非agenarians腹主动脉瘤是否可行? 注:你提供的原文中“Nonagenarians”这个词有误,正确的是“Nonagenarians”,意思是“九十多岁的人” 。修改后的译文为:九十多岁的患者行腹主动脉瘤传统开放性修复术是否可行?
Ann Vasc Dis. 2017 Sep 25;10(3):211-6. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.17-00013.
6
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between frailty and outcome in surgical patients.外科患者衰弱与预后之间关联的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Feb;98(2):80-5. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0048. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
7
Aortic dissection occurring 18 months after successful endovascular repair in an anatomically difficult case of abdominal aortic aneurysm.在一例解剖结构复杂的腹主动脉瘤成功进行血管腔内修复术后18个月发生主动脉夹层。
Case Rep Vasc Med. 2013;2013:412708. doi: 10.1155/2013/412708. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
8
Outcome after open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients >80 years old: a systematic review and meta-analysis.80岁以上患者腹主动脉瘤破裂开放修复术后的结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2011 Nov;35(11):2575-6; author reply 2577. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1214-4.