Ophthalmic Research Group, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011 Jan;31(1):69-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00798.x. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
This cross-sectional study was designed to determine whether the academic performance of optometry undergraduates is influenced by enrollment status, learning style or gender.
Three hundred and sixty undergraduates in all 3 years of the optometry degree course at Aston University during 2008-2009 were asked for their informed consent to participate in this study. Enrollment status was known from admissions records. An Index of Learning Styles (http://www4.nscu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Learning-Styles.html) determined learning style preference with respect to four different learning style axes; active-reflective, sensing-intuitive, visual-verbal and sequential-global. The influence of these factors on academic performance was investigated.
Two hundred and seventy students agreed to take part (75% of the cohort). 63% of the sample was female. There were 213 home non-graduates (entrants from the UK or European Union without a bachelor's degree or higher), 14 home graduates (entrants from the UK or European Union with a bachelor's degree or higher), 28 international non-graduates (entrants from outside the UK or European Union without a bachelor's degree or higher) and 15 international graduates (entrants from outside the UK or European Union with a bachelor's degree or higher). The majority of students were balanced learners (between 48% and 64% across four learning style axes). Any preferences were towards active, sensing, visual and sequential learning styles. Of the factors investigated in this study, learning styles were influenced by gender; females expressed a disproportionate preference for the reflective and visual learning styles. Academic performance was influenced by enrollment status; international graduates (95% confidence limits: 64-72%) outperformed all other student groups (home non graduates, 60-62%; international non graduates, 55-63%) apart from home graduates (57-69%).
Our research has shown that the majority of optometry students have balanced learning styles and, from the factors studied, academic performance is only influenced by enrollment status. Although learning style questionnaires offer suggestions on how to improve learning efficacy, our findings indicate that current teaching methods do not need to be altered to suit varying learning style preferences as balanced learning styles can easily adapt to any teaching style (Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review. London, UK: Learning and Skills Research Centre, 2004).
本横断面研究旨在确定视光学本科生的学业成绩是否受到入学身份、学习方式或性别影响。
2008-2009 年,在阿斯顿大学视光学学位课程的所有 3 年级的 360 名本科生被要求同意参与本研究。入学身份可从入学记录中得知。学习风格指数(http://www4.nscu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Learning-Styles.html)确定了在四个不同的学习风格轴(主动反思、感觉直觉、视觉语言和顺序全局)方面的学习风格偏好。研究了这些因素对学业成绩的影响。
270 名学生同意参与(占队列的 75%)。样本中有 63%为女性。有 213 名本地非毕业生(来自英国或欧盟的入学学生,没有学士学位或更高学位),14 名本地毕业生(来自英国或欧盟的入学学生,有学士学位或更高学位),28 名国际非毕业生(来自英国或欧盟以外的入学学生,没有学士学位或更高学位)和 15 名国际毕业生(来自英国或欧盟以外的入学学生,有学士学位或更高学位)。大多数学生是平衡学习者(在四个学习风格轴上的比例在 48%到 64%之间)。任何偏好都是针对主动、感觉、视觉和顺序学习风格。在本研究中调查的因素中,学习风格受到性别影响;女性对反思和视觉学习风格表现出不成比例的偏好。学业成绩受到入学身份影响;国际毕业生(95%置信区间:64-72%)表现优于所有其他学生群体(本地非毕业生,60-62%;国际非毕业生,55-63%),除了本地毕业生(57-69%)。
我们的研究表明,大多数视光学生具有平衡的学习风格,并且从所研究的因素来看,学业成绩仅受入学身份影响。尽管学习风格问卷提供了关于如何提高学习效果的建议,但我们的研究结果表明,目前的教学方法不需要根据不同的学习风格偏好进行改变,因为平衡的学习风格可以轻松适应任何教学风格(《16 岁后学习的学习风格和教学法:系统和批判性评价》。伦敦,英国:学习与技能研究中心,2004 年)。