Yale School of Public Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Addiction. 2011 Feb;106(2):357-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03149.x. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
To determine the comparative levels of and associations between policing interference and characteristics of US syringe exchange programs (SEPs).
Cross-sectional.
A national survey of US SEPs.
A total of 111 program managers (representing 59% of all US SEPs).
Program manager self-report.
With overall interference profiles ranging from systematic to totally interference-free, 43% of respondents reported at least monthly client harassment, 31% at least monthly unauthorized confiscation of clients' syringes, 12% at least monthly client arrest en route to or from SEP and 26% uninvited police appearances at program sites at least every 6 months. In multivariate modeling, legal status of SEP, jurisdiction's syringe regulation environment and affiliation with health department were not associated with frequency of police interference. Programs serving predominantly injection drug users (IDUs) of color were 3.56 times more likely to report frequent client arrest en route to or from SEP and 3.92 times more likely to report unauthorized syringe confiscation. Those serving more than three sites were 3.96 times more likely to report client harassment, while stationary operation was protective against uninvited police appearances. The majority (56%) reported not documenting adverse police events; those who did were 2.92 times more likely to report unauthorized syringe confiscation from clients.
Findings highlight limitations of the impact of legal reforms on aligning police activities with SEP operations. Systematic adverse event surveillance and evidence-based structural interventions are needed to maximize the benefits of public health prevention targeting IDUs and other criminalized populations. SEPs that report no adverse events may represent programs already working in harmony with law enforcement agencies, a priority highlighted in US Centers for Disease Control's new SEP guidelines. The significance of mechanisms translating criminal justice disparities into health disparities is discussed.
确定美国针具交换项目 (SEP) 的警务干预水平和特征之间的比较水平和关联。
横断面研究。
对美国 SEP 的全国性调查。
共有 111 名项目管理人员(代表所有美国 SEP 的 59%)。
项目管理人员自我报告。
在整体干扰情况从系统干扰到完全无干扰的范围内,43%的受访者报告至少每月发生一次客户骚扰,31%的受访者至少每月未经授权没收客户的注射器,12%的受访者至少每月有客户在前往或离开 SEP 的途中被捕,26%的受访者至少每 6 个月未经邀请出现在项目现场。在多变量建模中,SEP 的法律地位、管辖范围内的注射器监管环境以及与卫生部的隶属关系与警务干预的频率无关。主要为有色人种注射吸毒者 (IDU) 提供服务的项目报告说,客户在前往或离开 SEP 的途中经常被捕的可能性是其他项目的 3.56 倍,而且更有可能报告未经授权没收注射器。服务超过三个地点的项目报告客户骚扰的可能性增加 3.96 倍,而固定操作则可以防止警察未经邀请出现。大多数(56%)报告没有记录不良警察事件;那些这样做的人更有可能报告从客户那里没收未经授权的注射器,可能性增加 2.92 倍。
研究结果突显了法律改革对协调警务活动与 SEP 运营的影响存在局限性。需要进行系统的不良事件监测和基于证据的结构干预,以最大限度地发挥针对 IDU 和其他被定罪人群的公共卫生预防措施的益处。没有报告不良事件的 SEP 可能代表已经与执法机构和谐运作的项目,这是美国疾病控制与预防中心新的 SEP 指南中强调的一个优先事项。讨论了将刑事司法差异转化为健康差异的机制的意义。