Suppr超能文献

新诊断糖尿病患者口服抗糖尿病药物治疗的持续模式——一项基于人群的研究。

Persistence patterns with oral antidiabetes drug treatment in newly treated patients--a population-based study.

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Value Health. 2010 Sep-Oct;13(6):820-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00761.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We assessed persistence patterns with oral antidiabetes drug (OAD) in patients newly dispensed with different OAD classes.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort study using Quebec Health Insurance Board data. Patients aged 18 years or more newly dispensed an OAD between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2003 were included in the study (n=98,940). Persistence was defined as consistently refilling a prescription for the initial OAD within three times the days' supply of the preceding claim. For nonpersistent patients, a second course of therapy was defined as treatment initiation with any OAD after a first discontinuation. Patients were followed from treatment initiation up to December 31, 2004, ineligibility for the drug plan or death, whichever came first, and treatment discontinuation or second course of treatment. Cox regression models were used to compute adjusted hazards ratios (AHR) of persistence and initiation of second courses of therapy.

RESULTS

The probability of persisting with the initial OAD over a 12-month period was 65% and 56% for patients initiated on metformin and sylfonylurea, respectively. Compared to metformin, the likelihood of discontinuing the initial OAD over the study period was significantly higher for patients on sulphonylureas (AHR: 1.32; 95% CI 1.29-1.34). Patients started on sulphonylureas were also less likely to start a second course of therapy after a first treatment discontinuation (AHR: 0.91; 95% CI 0.89-0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to diabetic patients initiated on metformin, those initiated on sulphonylureas displayed poorer persistence patterns.

摘要

目的

评估新开具不同类别口服抗糖尿病药物(OAD)的患者持续使用 OAD 的模式。

方法

我们使用魁北克省健康保险委员会的数据进行了一项基于人群的队列研究。研究纳入了 1998 年 1 月 1 日至 2003 年 12 月 31 日期间新开具 OAD 的年龄在 18 岁及以上的患者(n=98940)。持续用药定义为在之前索赔的用药天数的三倍内,持续开具初始 OAD 的处方。对于非持续用药的患者,第二次疗程定义为在首次停药后使用任何 OAD 开始治疗。患者从治疗开始到 2004 年 12 月 31 日,或者首先失去药物计划资格或死亡,或者停药或第二次疗程。使用 Cox 回归模型计算持续使用初始 OAD 和开始第二次疗程治疗的调整后风险比(AHR)。

结果

在 12 个月期间,新起始用二甲双胍和磺酰脲类药物的患者持续使用初始 OAD 的概率分别为 65%和 56%。与二甲双胍相比,磺酰脲类药物在研究期间停止初始 OAD 的可能性显著更高(AHR:1.32;95%CI 1.29-1.34)。起始用磺酰脲类药物的患者在首次治疗停药后开始第二次疗程治疗的可能性也较低(AHR:0.91;95%CI 0.89-0.93)。

结论

与起始用二甲双胍的糖尿病患者相比,起始用磺酰脲类药物的患者的持续用药模式较差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验