Suppr超能文献

非专业眼科医生评估系列立体视盘照相青光眼改变的一致性和准确性。

Agreement and accuracy of non-expert ophthalmologists in assessing glaucomatous changes in serial stereo optic disc photographs.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Leuven University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2011 Apr;118(4):742-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.019. Epub 2010 Nov 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the interobserver agreement in detecting glaucomatous optic disc changes using serial stereophotography between a large group of non-expert ophthalmologists and glaucoma specialists; to assess the accuracy of non-experts; to investigate whether the interobserver agreement and the accuracy of non-experts changed after a training session.

DESIGN

Masked interobserver agreement study.

PARTICIPANTS

Serial optic disc stereophotos from 40 patients with glaucoma.

METHODS

Three independent experienced glaucoma specialists (readers of the European Glaucoma Prevention Study) evaluated a set of 2 serial optic disc color stereo-slides for glaucomatous change, obtained with a delay varying from 2 to 7 years of 40 patients, masked from the temporal sequence of the slides. Each patient was graded as changed or stable by agreement of 2 of 3 of the experts (the reference standard). Thirty-seven non-expert ophthalmologists independently evaluated the same set of serial optic disc stereo-slides twice, with the second evaluation on the same day, masked from the results of the previous evaluation, after a training session on a separate slide set.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Interobserver agreement of non-experts and experts in detecting glaucomatous optic disc changes (expressed as kappa coefficient); agreement of non-experts with the reference standard (accuracy) before and after a training session.

RESULTS

The interobserver kappa coefficient (κ) of the non-experts and experts was 0.20 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.21) and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.33-0.69), respectively (P<0.0001). The mean κ of the non-experts with the reference standard was 0.33 (95% CI, 0.27-0.39). After a training session, the interobserver agreement of the non-experts increased from 0.20 to 0.27 (95% CI, 0.26-0.28) (P<0.0001). The percentage agreement of the non-experts with the reference standard improved from 68.5% before to 71.4% after the training session (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P=0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

The interobserver agreement of non-expert ophthalmologists in detecting glaucomatous optic disc changes using serial stereophotos was significantly lower than that of experts, which was moderate. After a training session, the interobserver agreement and the accuracy of the non-experts showed a small but statistically significant improvement.

摘要

目的

比较一大群非专家眼科医生和青光眼专家使用系列立体摄影检测青光眼性视盘改变的观察者间一致性;评估非专家的准确性;研究在培训课程后,非专家的观察者间一致性和准确性是否发生变化。

设计

观察者间一致性的盲法研究。

参与者

40 例青光眼患者的系列视盘立体照片。

方法

三位独立的有经验的青光眼专家(欧洲青光眼预防研究的阅读者)评估了一组 2 张具有 2 至 7 年延迟的青光眼患者的彩色视盘立体幻灯片,这些幻灯片的时间顺序对专家进行了屏蔽。每位患者的分级结果由 3 位专家中的 2 位一致同意(参考标准)。37 名非专家眼科医生在同一天分别对同一组系列视盘立体幻灯片进行了两次独立评估,第二次评估在第一次评估结果被屏蔽的情况下进行,并在单独的幻灯片组上进行了培训课程。

主要观察指标

非专家和专家检测青光眼性视盘改变的观察者间一致性(用 κ 系数表示);培训课程前后非专家与参考标准的一致性(准确性)。

结果

非专家和专家的观察者间 κ 系数(κ)分别为 0.20(95%置信区间[CI],0.19-0.21)和 0.51(95% CI,0.33-0.69)(P<0.0001)。非专家与参考标准的平均 κ 值为 0.33(95% CI,0.27-0.39)。经过培训课程,非专家的观察者间一致性从 0.20 增加到 0.27(95% CI,0.26-0.28)(P<0.0001)。非专家与参考标准的一致性百分比从培训前的 68.5%提高到培训后的 71.4%(Wilcoxon 符号秩检验,P=0.034)。

结论

非专家眼科医生使用系列立体摄影检测青光眼性视盘改变的观察者间一致性明显低于专家,为中度。经过培训课程,非专家的观察者间一致性和准确性略有但具有统计学意义的提高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验