Department of Occupational Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Noerrebrogade 44, Building 2C, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011 May;37(3):186-95. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3130. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
High levels of work-related stress are associated with increased absenteeism from work and reduced work ability. In this study, we investigated the effects of a stress management intervention on absenteeism and return to work.
We randomized 102 participants into either the intervention or wait-list control (WLC) group. The intervention group received the intervention in weeks 1-16 from baseline, and the WLC group received the intervention in weeks 17-32. Self-reported data on absenteeism (number of days full- or part-time absent from work within the previous three months) were obtained at 16, 32, and 48 weeks follow-up. Register-based data on long-term absence from work were drawn from the Danish public transfer payments (DREAM) database from baseline and 48 weeks onwards. The DREAM database contains weekly information on long-term sickness absence compensation. The threshold to enter DREAM is sick leave for two consecutive weeks.
At follow-up in week 16, self-reported absenteeism in the intervention group [median 11 days (range 3-25)] was lower (P=0.02) than in the WLC group [median 45 days (range 19-60)], corresponding to a 29% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 5-52] reduction. On register-based data (cumulated weeks in DREAM, weeks 1-16), the intervention group median [6 weeks (range 0-11)] was lower than that of the WLC group [median 12 weeks (range 8-16)], though not significantly (P=0.06), corresponding to a 21% (95% CI 0-42) reduction. For return to work, a hazard ratio of 1.58 (95% CI 0.89-2.81) favoring the intervention group was found (P=0.12).
The intervention reduces self-reported absenteeism from work. A similar trend was found from register-based records. No conclusive evidence was found for return to work.
工作相关压力水平较高与旷工和工作能力下降有关。本研究旨在探讨压力管理干预对旷工和重返工作岗位的影响。
我们将 102 名参与者随机分为干预组或等待名单对照组(WLC)。干预组在基线后第 1-16 周接受干预,WLC 组在第 17-32 周接受干预。在第 16、32 和 48 周随访时,获得了过去三个月内每天全时或部分缺勤天数的自我报告数据。从基线和第 48 周开始,从丹麦公共转移支付(DREAM)数据库中提取了关于长期旷工的登记数据。DREAM 数据库包含了每周关于长期病假补偿的信息。进入 DREAM 的门槛是连续两周请病假。
在第 16 周的随访中,干预组的自我报告旷工率[中位数 11 天(范围 3-25)]较低(P=0.02),WLC 组[中位数 45 天(范围 19-60)]较高,干预组减少了 29%[95%置信区间(95%CI)5-52]。在登记数据(DREAM 中累积的周数,第 1-16 周)中,干预组的中位数[6 周(范围 0-11)]低于 WLC 组[中位数 12 周(范围 8-16)],但差异无统计学意义(P=0.06),干预组减少了 21%[95%CI 0-42]。在重返工作岗位方面,发现干预组有优势的风险比为 1.58(95%CI 0.89-2.81)(P=0.12)。
该干预措施可减少自我报告的旷工。从登记记录中也发现了类似的趋势。但没有确凿证据表明重返工作岗位。