Suppr超能文献

多胎产妇(≥10 次分娩)与年龄匹配的多胎产妇(<10 次分娩)母婴结局的前瞻性研究。

Prospective study of maternal and neonatal outcome in great-grand multiparous women (≥10 births) and in aged-matched women with lesser parity.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Oct;284(4):799-805. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1722-8. Epub 2010 Oct 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Evaluation of outcome of labor/delivery in great-grand multiparous (GGMP) women relative to women with lower parity is complicated because of confounding parity with (older) age. Herein, we compare maternal and neonatal outcome in GGMP from a large obstetrics department to that in older women with lesser parity.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of older gravid women. All laboring women in a 6-month period were included in this study if they were older than 36 years and had had 2-3 previous births (low parity) or 5-6 previous births (medium parity), and also all women ≥10 births (of any age); all other laboring women were excluded.

RESULTS

GGMP (187 women) relative to low-parity (128 women) and medium-parity (181 women) had higher mean gestational age (39.72 ± 1.8 vs. 39.1 ± 1.8 and 39.15 ± 1.6 weeks; p = 0.0011), mean dilatation at presentation (5.0 ± 2.0 vs. 4.3 ± 2.1 and 4.36 ± 2.0; p = 0.0074), and mean neonatal birth weight (3444.6 ± 540.8 vs. 2376 ± 507.8 and 3272.3 ± 559.5 g; p = 0.0032). GGMP relative to low- and medium-parity women had lower mean gravidity:parity (1.10 vs. 1.3 and 1.19; p < 0.0001); percent missed abortions (8 vs. 28.1 and 43.1%; p = <0.0001); mean second stage (10.4 ± 12.5 vs. 21.2 ± 26.4 and 12.8 ± 17.3 min; p < 0.0001); mean ratio previous cesarean sections: total potential deliveries (0.03 ± 1.07 vs. 0.16 ± 0.25 and 0.09 ± 0.22; p < 0.0001). The low parity group had the least good maternal and neonatal characteristics. There was no maternal or fetal mortality in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among older Israeli GGMP women, maternal and neonatal outcome is good and comparable to women of similar age, but lesser parity.

摘要

目的

与低产次(<3 次)妇女相比,高龄经产妇(≥4 次)的分娩结局评估较为复杂,因为其产次与年龄(高龄)相关。本研究旨在比较我院较大产科部门高龄经产妇与低产次(<3 次)和中产次(3-5 次)高龄妇女的母婴结局。

方法

这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,纳入了 6 个月内所有年龄>36 岁且有 2-3 次(低产次)或 5-6 次(中产次)分娩史的孕妇,也纳入了所有产次≥10 次(任何年龄)的孕妇;所有其他孕妇均排除在外。

结果

与低产次组(128 例)和中产次组(181 例)相比,高龄经产妇组(187 例)的平均孕龄(39.72±1.8 周 vs. 39.1±1.8 周和 39.15±1.6 周;p=0.0011)、就诊时的平均宫口扩张程度(5.0±2.0 cm vs. 4.3±2.1 cm 和 4.36±2.0 cm;p=0.0074)和新生儿出生体重(3444.6±540.8 g vs. 2376±507.8 g 和 3272.3±559.5 g;p=0.0032)更高。与低产次和中产次妇女相比,高龄经产妇的平均孕次:产次比(1.10:1.3 和 1.19;p<0.0001)、未发生难免流产的比例(8%:28.1% 和 43.1%;p<0.0001)、第二产程时间(10.4±12.5 min vs. 21.2±26.4 min 和 12.8±17.3 min;p<0.0001)和前次剖宫产例数:总分娩例数比(0.03:0.16 和 0.09:0.22;p<0.0001)更低。低产次组的母婴特征最差。在任何一组中均未发生孕产妇或胎儿死亡。

结论

在以色列高龄经产妇中,母婴结局良好,与相似年龄的妇女相当,但产次较少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验