• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切尔诺贝利的健康后果:纽约科学院发布了针对核机构伪科学的解毒剂。

Health consequences of Chernobyl: the New York Academy of Sciences publishes an antidote to the nuclear establishment's pseudo-science.

机构信息

Centre Europe Tiers Monde, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(4):679-98. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.4.g.

DOI:10.2190/HS.40.4.g
PMID:21058538
Abstract

In February 2010, the New York Academy of Sciences published the most complete and up-to-date collection of evidence, from independent, scientific sources all over the world, on the health and environmental consequences of the Chernobyl accident. For 24 years, through a high-level, internationally coordinated cover-up of the world's most serious industrial accident, the nuclear lobby has deprived the world of a unique and critically important source of scientific information. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), mouthpiece of the nuclear establishment, has coordinated the cover-up through the dissemination and imposition of crude pseudo-science. Regrettably, the World Health Organization, a U.N. agency on which the world's people rely for guidance, is subordinate to the IAEA in matters of radiation and health, has participated in the cover-up, and stands accused of non-assistance to populations in danger. The new book on Chernobyl makes available huge amounts of evidence from independent studies undertaken in the affected countries, unique and valuable data that have been ignored by the international health establishment. This comprehensive account of the full dimensions of the catastrophe reveals the shameful inadequacy of current international assistance to the affected populations. It also demonstrates, once more, that future energy options cannot include nuclear power.

摘要

2010 年 2 月,纽约科学院出版了来自世界各地独立的科学来源的关于切尔诺贝利事故对健康和环境影响的最完整和最新的证据合集。24 年来,通过对世界上最严重的工业事故的高级别、国际协调的掩盖,核游说团体剥夺了世界上一个独特而至关重要的科学信息来源。国际原子能机构(IAEA)作为核机构的代言人,通过传播和强制使用粗糙的伪科学来协调掩盖。令人遗憾的是,世界卫生组织是一个依赖于指导的联合国机构,在辐射和健康问题上隶属于原子能机构,参与了掩盖行动,并被指控未能援助处于危险中的人群。这本关于切尔诺贝利的新书提供了来自受影响国家进行的独立研究的大量证据,这些数据是国际卫生机构所忽略的独特而有价值的数据。这一对灾难全部范围的全面描述揭示了当前对受影响人群的国际援助的可耻不足。它还再次表明,未来的能源选择不能包括核能。

相似文献

1
Health consequences of Chernobyl: the New York Academy of Sciences publishes an antidote to the nuclear establishment's pseudo-science.切尔诺贝利的健康后果:纽约科学院发布了针对核机构伪科学的解毒剂。
Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(4):679-98. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.4.g.
2
Who Is Afraid of Volume 1181 of the New York Academy of Sciences? Under Threat, the Nuclear Establishment Plays Dirty.谁害怕《纽约科学院学报》第1181卷?在威胁之下,核机构使出了阴招。
Int J Health Serv. 2015;45(3):530-44. doi: 10.1177/0020731415584559.
3
Debate on the Chernobyl disaster: response to Dr. Sergei V. Jargin.切尔诺贝利灾难辩论:对谢尔盖·瓦西里耶维奇·亚尔金博士的回应。
Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(1):45-6. doi: 10.2190/HS.42.1.e.
4
On protecting the inexperienced reader from Chernobyl myths.关于保护缺乏经验的读者免受切尔诺贝利神话的影响。
J Radiol Prot. 2012 Jun;32(2):181-9. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/32/2/181. Epub 2012 May 8.
5
Debate on the Chernobyl disaster: on the causes of Chernobyl overestimation.切尔诺贝利灾难的争论:对切尔诺贝利高估原因的探讨。
Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(1):29-34. doi: 10.2190/HS.42.1.c.
6
Chernobyl: an unbelievable failure to help.切尔诺贝利:一次令人难以置信的救援失败。
Int J Health Serv. 2008;38(3):543-60. doi: 10.2190/HS.38.3.i.
7
The consequences of the Chernobyl accident one decade after the disaster.切尔诺贝利事故发生十年后的后果。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 1996;9(4):365-74.
8
The mental health of clean-up workers 18 years after the Chernobyl accident.切尔诺贝利事故18年后清理工人的心理健康状况。
Psychol Med. 2008 Apr;38(4):481-8. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707002371. Epub 2007 Nov 30.
9
Criticism of Volume 1181 of the New York Academy of Sciences Reaches a New Low.《纽约科学院学报》第 1181 卷遭新一波猛烈抨击。
Int J Health Serv. 2017 Apr;47(2):374-381. doi: 10.1177/0020731416689553. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
10
Debate on the Chernobyl disaster: response to Dr. Sergei V. Jargin.切尔诺贝利灾难辩论:回应谢尔盖·V·加尔金博士。
Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(1):35-44. doi: 10.2190/HS.42.1.d.